Are women less effective leaders than men? Evidence from experiments using coordination games
(2023) In Discussion Paper p.1-46- Abstract
- We study whether one reason behind female underrepresentation in leadership is that female leaders are less effective at coordinating followers’ actions. Two experiments using coordination games investigate whether female leaders are less successful than males in
persuading followers to coordinate on efficient equilibria. In these settings, successful coordination hinges on higher-order beliefs about the leader’s capacity to convince followersto pursue desired actions, making beliefs that women are less effective leaders potentially selfconfirming. We find no evidence that such bias impacts actual leadership performance, precisely estimating the absence of a gender leadership gap. We further show that this result is surprising given... (More) - We study whether one reason behind female underrepresentation in leadership is that female leaders are less effective at coordinating followers’ actions. Two experiments using coordination games investigate whether female leaders are less successful than males in
persuading followers to coordinate on efficient equilibria. In these settings, successful coordination hinges on higher-order beliefs about the leader’s capacity to convince followersto pursue desired actions, making beliefs that women are less effective leaders potentially selfconfirming. We find no evidence that such bias impacts actual leadership performance, precisely estimating the absence of a gender leadership gap. We further show that this result is surprising given experts’ priors. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/de4472fa-fdf5-40ad-990b-97a41a656e6b
- author
- Heursen, Lea ; Ranehill, Eva LU and Weber, Roberto A.
- organization
- publishing date
- 2023
- type
- Working paper/Preprint
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- gender, coordination games, leadership, experiment, D23, C72, C92, J1
- in
- Discussion Paper
- issue
- 472
- pages
- 1 - 46
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- de4472fa-fdf5-40ad-990b-97a41a656e6b
- alternative location
- https://hdl.handle.net/10419/282163
- date added to LUP
- 2025-02-28 15:05:58
- date last changed
- 2025-04-04 15:29:15
@misc{de4472fa-fdf5-40ad-990b-97a41a656e6b, abstract = {{We study whether one reason behind female underrepresentation in leadership is that female leaders are less effective at coordinating followers’ actions. Two experiments using coordination games investigate whether female leaders are less successful than males in <br/>persuading followers to coordinate on efficient equilibria. In these settings, successful coordination hinges on higher-order beliefs about the leader’s capacity to convince followersto pursue desired actions, making beliefs that women are less effective leaders potentially selfconfirming. We find no evidence that such bias impacts actual leadership performance, precisely estimating the absence of a gender leadership gap. We further show that this result is surprising given experts’ priors.}}, author = {{Heursen, Lea and Ranehill, Eva and Weber, Roberto A.}}, keywords = {{gender; coordination games; leadership; experiment; D23; C72; C92; J1}}, language = {{eng}}, note = {{Working Paper}}, number = {{472}}, pages = {{1--46}}, series = {{Discussion Paper}}, title = {{Are women less effective leaders than men? Evidence from experiments using coordination games}}, url = {{https://hdl.handle.net/10419/282163}}, year = {{2023}}, }