Advanced

Processing relative clause extractions in Swedish

Tutunjian, Damon LU ; Heinat, Fredrik; Klingvall, Eva LU and Wiklund, Anna-Lena LU (2017) In Frontiers in Psychology 8.
Abstract
Relative clauses are considered strong islands for extraction across languages. Swedish comprises a well-known exception, allegedly allowing extraction from relative clauses (RCE), raising the possibility that island constraints may be subject to "deep variation" between languages. One alternative is that such exceptions are only illusory and represent "surface variation" attributable to independently motivated syntactic properties. Yet, to date, no surface account has proven tenable for Swedish RCEs. The present study uses eyetracking while reading to test whether the apparent acceptability of Swedish RCEs has any processing correlates at the point of filler integration compared to uncontroversial strong island violations. Experiment 1... (More)
Relative clauses are considered strong islands for extraction across languages. Swedish comprises a well-known exception, allegedly allowing extraction from relative clauses (RCE), raising the possibility that island constraints may be subject to "deep variation" between languages. One alternative is that such exceptions are only illusory and represent "surface variation" attributable to independently motivated syntactic properties. Yet, to date, no surface account has proven tenable for Swedish RCEs. The present study uses eyetracking while reading to test whether the apparent acceptability of Swedish RCEs has any processing correlates at the point of filler integration compared to uncontroversial strong island violations. Experiment 1 tests RCE against licit that-clause extraction (TCE), illicit extraction from a non-restrictive RC island (NRCE), and an intransitive control. For this, RCE was found to pattern similarly to TCE at the point of integration in early measures, but between TCE and NRCE in total durations. Experiment 2 uses RCE and extraction from a subject NP island (SRCE) to test the hypothesis that only non-islands will show effects of implausible filler-verb dependencies. RCE showed sensitivity to the plausibility manipulation across measures at the first potential point of filler integration, whereas such effec.ts were limited to late measures for SRCE. In addition, structural facilitation was seen across measures for RCE relative to SRCE. We propose that our results are compatible with RCEs being licit weak island extractions in Swedish, and that the overall picture speaks in favor of a surface rather than a deep variation approach to the lack of island effects in Swedish RCEs (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
eyetracking, sentence processing, filler-gap, integration, Island constraints, plausibility, relative clause, Swedish
in
Frontiers in Psychology
volume
8
publisher
Frontiers
external identifiers
  • scopus:85037103683
  • wos:000417273400001
ISSN
1664-1078
DOI
10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02118
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
e18c8d52-20dc-4994-a5c7-de5be02dd65e
date added to LUP
2017-11-20 22:18:54
date last changed
2018-01-16 13:26:02
@article{e18c8d52-20dc-4994-a5c7-de5be02dd65e,
  abstract     = {Relative clauses are considered strong islands for extraction across languages. Swedish comprises a well-known exception, allegedly allowing extraction from relative clauses (RCE), raising the possibility that island constraints may be subject to "deep variation" between languages. One alternative is that such exceptions are only illusory and represent "surface variation" attributable to independently motivated syntactic properties. Yet, to date, no surface account has proven tenable for Swedish RCEs. The present study uses eyetracking while reading to test whether the apparent acceptability of Swedish RCEs has any processing correlates at the point of filler integration compared to uncontroversial strong island violations. Experiment 1 tests RCE against licit that-clause extraction (TCE), illicit extraction from a non-restrictive RC island (NRCE), and an intransitive control. For this, RCE was found to pattern similarly to TCE at the point of integration in early measures, but between TCE and NRCE in total durations. Experiment 2 uses RCE and extraction from a subject NP island (SRCE) to test the hypothesis that only non-islands will show effects of implausible filler-verb dependencies. RCE showed sensitivity to the plausibility manipulation across measures at the first potential point of filler integration, whereas such effec.ts were limited to late measures for SRCE. In addition, structural facilitation was seen across measures for RCE relative to SRCE. We propose that our results are compatible with RCEs being licit weak island extractions in Swedish, and that the overall picture speaks in favor of a surface rather than a deep variation approach to the lack of island effects in Swedish RCEs},
  articleno    = {2118},
  author       = {Tutunjian, Damon and Heinat, Fredrik and Klingvall, Eva and Wiklund, Anna-Lena},
  issn         = {1664-1078},
  keyword      = {eyetracking,sentence processing,filler-gap,integration,Island constraints,plausibility,relative clause,Swedish},
  language     = {eng},
  month        = {12},
  publisher    = {Frontiers},
  series       = {Frontiers in Psychology},
  title        = {Processing relative clause extractions in Swedish},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02118},
  volume       = {8},
  year         = {2017},
}