Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Tempo and drivers of 3D eye size evolution in temperate butterflies

Halali, Sridhar LU ; Hall, Stephen A LU ; Pettersson, Lars B LU orcid ; Carrié, Romain LU ; Caplat, Paul LU ; Baird, Emily LU and Wahlberg, Niklas LU (2026) In Evolution letters 10(2). p.195-206
Abstract
Sensory traits shape animal lifestyles due to the central role they play in retrieving and processing environmental information. However, being some of the most energetically expensive tissues to build and maintain, ecological demands often modulate investment in these organs. Evidence that ecology shapes the evolution of sensory traits is plenty, but is heavily biased towards vertebrates and has only recently begun to emerge in invertebrates. Here, we elucidate the macroevolution of a key sensory organ—eye size—using temperate butterflies as models. Using micro-CT X-ray imaging of pinned museum specimens, we quantified the eye size of 443 individuals comprising 59 species. Further, using 12 years of long-term monitoring data to quantify... (More)
Sensory traits shape animal lifestyles due to the central role they play in retrieving and processing environmental information. However, being some of the most energetically expensive tissues to build and maintain, ecological demands often modulate investment in these organs. Evidence that ecology shapes the evolution of sensory traits is plenty, but is heavily biased towards vertebrates and has only recently begun to emerge in invertebrates. Here, we elucidate the macroevolution of a key sensory organ—eye size—using temperate butterflies as models. Using micro-CT X-ray imaging of pinned museum specimens, we quantified the eye size of 443 individuals comprising 59 species. Further, using 12 years of long-term monitoring data to quantify species habitat, we tested the hypothesis that forest-associated species, likely experiencing dimmer light conditions, should have larger eyes than those from open habitats. Our comparative analyses revealed tight allometric scaling between eye and wing size, and phylogeny alone explained 74% of eye size variation, with low heterogeneity in the evolutionary rates. Further, we found that habitat structure had no association with eye size. Overall, our findings indicate that allometry and shared ancestry, not ecology, shape the macroevolution of 3D eye size in temperate butterflies. We also demonstrate how non-invasive microCT imaging can be used on pinned museum specimens for studying phenotypic evolution on a macroevolutionary scale. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Evolution letters
volume
10
issue
2
article number
qrag001
pages
195 - 206
publisher
Oxford University Press
external identifiers
  • pmid:41938212
ISSN
2056-3744
DOI
10.1093/evlett/qrag001
project
Svensk Dagfjärilsövervakning
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
e228017a-bce0-4546-a461-6fdbc5b0bf78
date added to LUP
2026-05-12 14:41:36
date last changed
2026-05-19 12:31:04
@article{e228017a-bce0-4546-a461-6fdbc5b0bf78,
  abstract     = {{Sensory traits shape animal lifestyles due to the central role they play in retrieving and processing environmental information. However, being some of the most energetically expensive tissues to build and maintain, ecological demands often modulate investment in these organs. Evidence that ecology shapes the evolution of sensory traits is plenty, but is heavily biased towards vertebrates and has only recently begun to emerge in invertebrates. Here, we elucidate the macroevolution of a key sensory organ—eye size—using temperate butterflies as models. Using micro-CT X-ray imaging of pinned museum specimens, we quantified the eye size of 443 individuals comprising 59 species. Further, using 12 years of long-term monitoring data to quantify species habitat, we tested the hypothesis that forest-associated species, likely experiencing dimmer light conditions, should have larger eyes than those from open habitats. Our comparative analyses revealed tight allometric scaling between eye and wing size, and phylogeny alone explained 74% of eye size variation, with low heterogeneity in the evolutionary rates. Further, we found that habitat structure had no association with eye size. Overall, our findings indicate that allometry and shared ancestry, not ecology, shape the macroevolution of 3D eye size in temperate butterflies. We also demonstrate how non-invasive microCT imaging can be used on pinned museum specimens for studying phenotypic evolution on a macroevolutionary scale.}},
  author       = {{Halali, Sridhar and Hall, Stephen A and Pettersson, Lars B and Carrié, Romain and Caplat, Paul and Baird, Emily and Wahlberg, Niklas}},
  issn         = {{2056-3744}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{195--206}},
  publisher    = {{Oxford University Press}},
  series       = {{Evolution letters}},
  title        = {{Tempo and drivers of 3D eye size evolution in temperate butterflies}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/evlett/qrag001}},
  doi          = {{10.1093/evlett/qrag001}},
  volume       = {{10}},
  year         = {{2026}},
}