Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Authoritarian regime types revisited: updated data in comparative perspective

Wahman, Michael LU ; Teorell, Jan LU orcid and Hadenius, Axel LU (2013) In Contemporary Politics 19(1). p.19-34
Abstract
This article introduces a modified and updated version of the authoritarian regime type dataset first introduced by Hadenius and Teorell [2007. Pathways from authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy, 18 (1), 143–157]. The basic logic and merits of this dataset is presented, previously published criticism of the index is addressed and practical advice for potential users is provided. The dataset is also compared theoretically and empirically with the datasets provided by Cheibub et al. [2010. Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice, 143 (1), 67–101] and Geddes et al. [2012a. Authoritarian Regimes: a New Data Set. Manuscript]. It is argued that the choice of dataset is likely to have a substantial effect on the results of empirical... (More)
This article introduces a modified and updated version of the authoritarian regime type dataset first introduced by Hadenius and Teorell [2007. Pathways from authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy, 18 (1), 143–157]. The basic logic and merits of this dataset is presented, previously published criticism of the index is addressed and practical advice for potential users is provided. The dataset is also compared theoretically and empirically with the datasets provided by Cheibub et al. [2010. Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice, 143 (1), 67–101] and Geddes et al. [2012a. Authoritarian Regimes: a New Data Set. Manuscript]. It is argued that the choice of dataset is likely to have a substantial effect on the results of empirical research. The different datasets all have their respective strengths and weaknesses. However, our typology of authoritarianism distinguishes itself from the alternative categorisations in that it recognises the heterogeneous character of electoral regimes and provides a category corresponding to the theoretically interesting class of ‘electoral authoritarian’ regimes. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Contemporary Politics
volume
19
issue
1
pages
19 - 34
publisher
Routledge
external identifiers
  • wos:000317695900002
  • scopus:84876025296
ISSN
1469-3631
DOI
10.1080/13569775.2013.773200
project
Internationell demokratisering
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
e3b4edae-5ed0-4c31-9a32-64feaf07567a (old id 3630168)
date added to LUP
2016-04-01 10:15:57
date last changed
2022-04-27 20:11:29
@article{e3b4edae-5ed0-4c31-9a32-64feaf07567a,
  abstract     = {{This article introduces a modified and updated version of the authoritarian regime type dataset first introduced by Hadenius and Teorell [2007. Pathways from authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy, 18 (1), 143–157]. The basic logic and merits of this dataset is presented, previously published criticism of the index is addressed and practical advice for potential users is provided. The dataset is also compared theoretically and empirically with the datasets provided by Cheibub et al. [2010. Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice, 143 (1), 67–101] and Geddes et al. [2012a. Authoritarian Regimes: a New Data Set. Manuscript]. It is argued that the choice of dataset is likely to have a substantial effect on the results of empirical research. The different datasets all have their respective strengths and weaknesses. However, our typology of authoritarianism distinguishes itself from the alternative categorisations in that it recognises the heterogeneous character of electoral regimes and provides a category corresponding to the theoretically interesting class of ‘electoral authoritarian’ regimes.}},
  author       = {{Wahman, Michael and Teorell, Jan and Hadenius, Axel}},
  issn         = {{1469-3631}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{19--34}},
  publisher    = {{Routledge}},
  series       = {{Contemporary Politics}},
  title        = {{Authoritarian regime types revisited: updated data in comparative perspective}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2013.773200}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/13569775.2013.773200}},
  volume       = {{19}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}