Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Global longitudinal strain in long-term risk prediction after acute coronary syndrome : an investigation of added prognostic value to ejection fraction

Lenell, Joel ; Lindahl, Bertil ; Erlinge, David LU orcid ; Jernberg, Tomas ; Spaak, Jonas and Baron, Tomasz (2024) In Clinical Research in Cardiology
Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to investigate the additional value of global longitudinal strain (GLS) on top of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in long-term risk prediction of combined death and heart failure (HF) re-hospitalization after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Method and results: This retrospective study included patients admitted with ACS between 2008 and 2014 from the three participating university hospitals. LVEF and GLS were assessed at a core lab from images acquired during the index hospital stay. Their prognostic value was studied with the Cox proportional hazards model (median follow-up 6.2 years). A nested model comparison was performed with C-statistics. A total of 941 patients qualified for multivariable analysis... (More)

Aims: This study aimed to investigate the additional value of global longitudinal strain (GLS) on top of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in long-term risk prediction of combined death and heart failure (HF) re-hospitalization after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Method and results: This retrospective study included patients admitted with ACS between 2008 and 2014 from the three participating university hospitals. LVEF and GLS were assessed at a core lab from images acquired during the index hospital stay. Their prognostic value was studied with the Cox proportional hazards model (median follow-up 6.2 years). A nested model comparison was performed with C-statistics. A total of 941 patients qualified for multivariable analysis after multiple imputation of missing baseline covariables. The combined outcome was reached in 17.7% of the cases. Both GLS and LVEF were independent predictors of the combined outcome, hazard ratio (HR) 1.068 (95% CI 1.017–1.121) and HR 0.980 (95% CI 0.962–0.998), respectively. The C-statistic increased from 0.742 (95% CI 0.702–0.783) to 0.749 (95% CI 0.709–0.789) (P = 0.693) when GLS entered the model with clinical data and LVEF. Conclusion: GLS emerged as an independent long-term risk predictor of all-cause death and HF re-hospitalization. However, there was no significant incremental predictive value of GLS when LVEF was already known. Graphical Abstract: (Figure presented.)

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
epub
subject
keywords
ACS, GLS, LVEF, Myocardial infarction, Prognosis, SWEDEHEART
in
Clinical Research in Cardiology
publisher
Steinkopff
external identifiers
  • pmid:38526603
  • scopus:85188531508
ISSN
1861-0684
DOI
10.1007/s00392-024-02439-w
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
ec047635-b808-4ae9-a26a-6459111ef748
date added to LUP
2024-04-12 10:01:25
date last changed
2024-06-07 16:15:07
@article{ec047635-b808-4ae9-a26a-6459111ef748,
  abstract     = {{<p>Aims: This study aimed to investigate the additional value of global longitudinal strain (GLS) on top of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in long-term risk prediction of combined death and heart failure (HF) re-hospitalization after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Method and results: This retrospective study included patients admitted with ACS between 2008 and 2014 from the three participating university hospitals. LVEF and GLS were assessed at a core lab from images acquired during the index hospital stay. Their prognostic value was studied with the Cox proportional hazards model (median follow-up 6.2 years). A nested model comparison was performed with C-statistics. A total of 941 patients qualified for multivariable analysis after multiple imputation of missing baseline covariables. The combined outcome was reached in 17.7% of the cases. Both GLS and LVEF were independent predictors of the combined outcome, hazard ratio (HR) 1.068 (95% CI 1.017–1.121) and HR 0.980 (95% CI 0.962–0.998), respectively. The C-statistic increased from 0.742 (95% CI 0.702–0.783) to 0.749 (95% CI 0.709–0.789) (P = 0.693) when GLS entered the model with clinical data and LVEF. Conclusion: GLS emerged as an independent long-term risk predictor of all-cause death and HF re-hospitalization. However, there was no significant incremental predictive value of GLS when LVEF was already known. Graphical Abstract: (Figure presented.)</p>}},
  author       = {{Lenell, Joel and Lindahl, Bertil and Erlinge, David and Jernberg, Tomas and Spaak, Jonas and Baron, Tomasz}},
  issn         = {{1861-0684}},
  keywords     = {{ACS; GLS; LVEF; Myocardial infarction; Prognosis; SWEDEHEART}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  publisher    = {{Steinkopff}},
  series       = {{Clinical Research in Cardiology}},
  title        = {{Global longitudinal strain in long-term risk prediction after acute coronary syndrome : an investigation of added prognostic value to ejection fraction}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-024-02439-w}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s00392-024-02439-w}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}