Involutionary Growth in a Labour-Scarce Economy. A dialectic interpretation of the boom and bust of cocoa production in Ghana, c. 1890-1970
(2013) In Lund Papers in Economic History. Development Economics- Abstract
- The use of the analytical tools of classic and neo-classic economics has played a significant role in the study of Africa’s economic history since the 1970s. In this paper, we summon this body of work under the paradigm of Smithian growth models. Although different in techniques and approaches, this work shares a use of markets as the organising principle of the study. The aim of this paper is to critically reflect on the validity of Smithian models. We use the boom and bust of cocoa production in Ghana as an example, and conclude that while Smithian approaches provide valid explanations for the initial expansion, but are less suitable for explaining economic decline. The latter is explained by factors that are found outside of the realm... (More)
- The use of the analytical tools of classic and neo-classic economics has played a significant role in the study of Africa’s economic history since the 1970s. In this paper, we summon this body of work under the paradigm of Smithian growth models. Although different in techniques and approaches, this work shares a use of markets as the organising principle of the study. The aim of this paper is to critically reflect on the validity of Smithian models. We use the boom and bust of cocoa production in Ghana as an example, and conclude that while Smithian approaches provide valid explanations for the initial expansion, but are less suitable for explaining economic decline. The latter is explained by factors that are found outside of the realm of economics and thereby detached from the economic forces that account for the initial boom. We present a different analytical framework – based on the concepts of involutionary growth and forest rents – and argue that the decline in cocoa production was endogenously driven by the specific structural conditions created by cocoa production. We argue that our tentative dialectic interpretation is theoretically more consistent and empirically more plausible than previous Smithian analyses. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/7868987
- author
- Green, Erik LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2013
- type
- Working paper/Preprint
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- cocoa, Ghana, Forest Rent, Smithian Models, Involution
- in
- Lund Papers in Economic History. Development Economics
- issue
- 129
- publisher
- Department of Economic History, Lund University
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- ec38a9c6-0aa3-4daa-bd15-2feca1f3d4ac (old id 7868987)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-04 09:54:33
- date last changed
- 2018-11-21 20:55:38
@misc{ec38a9c6-0aa3-4daa-bd15-2feca1f3d4ac, abstract = {{The use of the analytical tools of classic and neo-classic economics has played a significant role in the study of Africa’s economic history since the 1970s. In this paper, we summon this body of work under the paradigm of Smithian growth models. Although different in techniques and approaches, this work shares a use of markets as the organising principle of the study. The aim of this paper is to critically reflect on the validity of Smithian models. We use the boom and bust of cocoa production in Ghana as an example, and conclude that while Smithian approaches provide valid explanations for the initial expansion, but are less suitable for explaining economic decline. The latter is explained by factors that are found outside of the realm of economics and thereby detached from the economic forces that account for the initial boom. We present a different analytical framework – based on the concepts of involutionary growth and forest rents – and argue that the decline in cocoa production was endogenously driven by the specific structural conditions created by cocoa production. We argue that our tentative dialectic interpretation is theoretically more consistent and empirically more plausible than previous Smithian analyses.}}, author = {{Green, Erik}}, keywords = {{cocoa; Ghana; Forest Rent; Smithian Models; Involution}}, language = {{eng}}, note = {{Working Paper}}, number = {{129}}, publisher = {{Department of Economic History, Lund University}}, series = {{Lund Papers in Economic History. Development Economics}}, title = {{Involutionary Growth in a Labour-Scarce Economy. A dialectic interpretation of the boom and bust of cocoa production in Ghana, c. 1890-1970}}, url = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/5417007/7868988}}, year = {{2013}}, }