Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Practicing What We Preach? Reflections on More Sustainable and Responsible IS Research and Teaching Practices

Kranz, Johann ; Zeiss, Roman ; Beck, Roman ; Gholami, Roya ; Sarker, Saonee LU ; Watson, Richard T. and Whitley, Edgar A. (2022) In Communications of the Association for Information Systems 51(1). p.557-580
Abstract

Research on IS solutions for environmental sustainability have evolved to a modest, but firm body of knowledge. Despite this progressive understanding about the potential of IS in enabling environmental sustainability, our academic practices seem widely unaffected by these insights. The way we do research or conduct teaching is rarely influenced by sustainability considerations. For example, before the pandemic many of us belonged to a hypermobile group that travelled 5-6 times more than the average employee. Our research is also often not aligned with environmental goals. We research digital technologies without sufficiently acknowledging the significant amounts of resources they consume. Similarly, our teaching often focuses on the... (More)

Research on IS solutions for environmental sustainability have evolved to a modest, but firm body of knowledge. Despite this progressive understanding about the potential of IS in enabling environmental sustainability, our academic practices seem widely unaffected by these insights. The way we do research or conduct teaching is rarely influenced by sustainability considerations. For example, before the pandemic many of us belonged to a hypermobile group that travelled 5-6 times more than the average employee. Our research is also often not aligned with environmental goals. We research digital technologies without sufficiently acknowledging the significant amounts of resources they consume. Similarly, our teaching often focuses on the effective development and use of information systems; however, rebound, second order, or spillover effects are barely covered. Based on these observations we raise the question: Are we practicing enough of what we preach? While recognizing several efforts of IS researchers, we can no longer ignore the ‘environmental elephant in the room’. In our panel report, we discuss the status-quo and ideas to improve the environmental and societal impact of our academic practices and present three ideas to move forward: Leverage virtualization and limit air travel, overhaul teaching curricula, and recalibrate incentives and evaluation regimes.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Business Ethics, Environmental Sustainability, Management Teaching, Sustainable Development Goals
in
Communications of the Association for Information Systems
volume
51
issue
1
pages
24 pages
publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
external identifiers
  • scopus:85141737667
ISSN
1529-3181
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
f07d8068-def0-4633-8f5a-8a5889635020
date added to LUP
2022-12-05 15:12:33
date last changed
2022-12-05 15:12:33
@article{f07d8068-def0-4633-8f5a-8a5889635020,
  abstract     = {{<p>Research on IS solutions for environmental sustainability have evolved to a modest, but firm body of knowledge. Despite this progressive understanding about the potential of IS in enabling environmental sustainability, our academic practices seem widely unaffected by these insights. The way we do research or conduct teaching is rarely influenced by sustainability considerations. For example, before the pandemic many of us belonged to a hypermobile group that travelled 5-6 times more than the average employee. Our research is also often not aligned with environmental goals. We research digital technologies without sufficiently acknowledging the significant amounts of resources they consume. Similarly, our teaching often focuses on the effective development and use of information systems; however, rebound, second order, or spillover effects are barely covered. Based on these observations we raise the question: Are we practicing enough of what we preach? While recognizing several efforts of IS researchers, we can no longer ignore the ‘environmental elephant in the room’. In our panel report, we discuss the status-quo and ideas to improve the environmental and societal impact of our academic practices and present three ideas to move forward: Leverage virtualization and limit air travel, overhaul teaching curricula, and recalibrate incentives and evaluation regimes.</p>}},
  author       = {{Kranz, Johann and Zeiss, Roman and Beck, Roman and Gholami, Roya and Sarker, Saonee and Watson, Richard T. and Whitley, Edgar A.}},
  issn         = {{1529-3181}},
  keywords     = {{Business Ethics; Environmental Sustainability; Management Teaching; Sustainable Development Goals}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{557--580}},
  publisher    = {{Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)}},
  series       = {{Communications of the Association for Information Systems}},
  title        = {{Practicing What We Preach? Reflections on More Sustainable and Responsible IS Research and Teaching Practices}},
  volume       = {{51}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}