Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Benchmark simulation models, quo vadis?

Jeppsson, Ulf LU ; Alex, J ; Batstone, D J ; Benedetti, L ; Comas, J ; Copp, J B ; Corominas, L ; Flores-Alsina, X ; Gernaey, K V and Nopens, I , et al. (2013) In Water Science and Technology 68(1). p.1-15
Abstract
As the work of the IWA Task Group on Benchmarking of Control Strategies for wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) is coming to an end, it is essential to disseminate the knowledge gained. For this reason, all authors of the IWA Scientific and Technical Report on benchmarking have come together to provide their insights, highlighting areas where knowledge may still be deficient and where new opportunities are emerging, and to propose potential avenues for future development and application of the general benchmarking framework and its associated tools. The paper focuses on the topics of temporal and spatial extension, process modifications within the WWTP, the realism of models, control strategy extensions and the potential for new evaluation... (More)
As the work of the IWA Task Group on Benchmarking of Control Strategies for wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) is coming to an end, it is essential to disseminate the knowledge gained. For this reason, all authors of the IWA Scientific and Technical Report on benchmarking have come together to provide their insights, highlighting areas where knowledge may still be deficient and where new opportunities are emerging, and to propose potential avenues for future development and application of the general benchmarking framework and its associated tools. The paper focuses on the topics of temporal and spatial extension, process modifications within the WWTP, the realism of models, control strategy extensions and the potential for new evaluation tools within the existing benchmark system. We find that there are major opportunities for application within all of these areas, either from existing work already being done within the context of the benchmarking simulation models (BSMs) or applicable work in the wider literature. Of key importance is increasing capability, usability and transparency of the BSM package while avoiding unnecessary complexity. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; and , et al. (More)
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; and (Less)
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Water Science and Technology
volume
68
issue
1
pages
1 - 15
publisher
IWA Publishing
external identifiers
  • wos:000321336600001
  • pmid:23823534
  • scopus:84881188985
  • pmid:23823534
ISSN
0273-1223
DOI
10.2166/wst.2013.246
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
f626e8d1-b091-4e7d-87eb-f2d1859fa9ab (old id 3956240)
date added to LUP
2016-04-01 13:33:52
date last changed
2022-04-14 01:53:22
@article{f626e8d1-b091-4e7d-87eb-f2d1859fa9ab,
  abstract     = {{As the work of the IWA Task Group on Benchmarking of Control Strategies for wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) is coming to an end, it is essential to disseminate the knowledge gained. For this reason, all authors of the IWA Scientific and Technical Report on benchmarking have come together to provide their insights, highlighting areas where knowledge may still be deficient and where new opportunities are emerging, and to propose potential avenues for future development and application of the general benchmarking framework and its associated tools. The paper focuses on the topics of temporal and spatial extension, process modifications within the WWTP, the realism of models, control strategy extensions and the potential for new evaluation tools within the existing benchmark system. We find that there are major opportunities for application within all of these areas, either from existing work already being done within the context of the benchmarking simulation models (BSMs) or applicable work in the wider literature. Of key importance is increasing capability, usability and transparency of the BSM package while avoiding unnecessary complexity.}},
  author       = {{Jeppsson, Ulf and Alex, J and Batstone, D J and Benedetti, L and Comas, J and Copp, J B and Corominas, L and Flores-Alsina, X and Gernaey, K V and Nopens, I and Pons, M-N and Rodríguez-Roda, I and Rosen, C and Steyer, J-P and Vanrolleghem, P A and Volcke, E I P and Vrecko, D}},
  issn         = {{0273-1223}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{1--15}},
  publisher    = {{IWA Publishing}},
  series       = {{Water Science and Technology}},
  title        = {{Benchmark simulation models, quo vadis?}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wst.2013.246}},
  doi          = {{10.2166/wst.2013.246}},
  volume       = {{68}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}