Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

The evolution of climate justice claims in global climate change negotiations under the UNFCCC

Lefstad, Lina LU and Paavola, Jouni (2023) In Critical Policy Studies
Abstract

A growing body of research suggests that the global conception of climate change is increasingly taking a justice-focus. However, the justice-framings of different actors in the UNFCCC process and their evolution have not yet been examined. We conduct a critical discourse analysis of climate justice claims of state and non-state actors in COP15, COP19, COP21 and COP24 which are key moments for climate justice under the UNFCCC. Our findings indicate that the UNFCCC has not delivered on climate justice, power stands out as a key issue in the negotiations, and the negotiations reproduce structures of climate injustice. We identified four new country groupings with different climate justice frames. The Radicals consider climate change an... (More)

A growing body of research suggests that the global conception of climate change is increasingly taking a justice-focus. However, the justice-framings of different actors in the UNFCCC process and their evolution have not yet been examined. We conduct a critical discourse analysis of climate justice claims of state and non-state actors in COP15, COP19, COP21 and COP24 which are key moments for climate justice under the UNFCCC. Our findings indicate that the UNFCCC has not delivered on climate justice, power stands out as a key issue in the negotiations, and the negotiations reproduce structures of climate injustice. We identified four new country groupings with different climate justice frames. The Radicals consider climate change an imminent threat, while Opportunists seek to benefit from it. The Hypocrites recognize their contribution to climate change but avoid responsibility through libertarian mechanisms. The Evaders construe justice a normative issue and block others’ justice claims. These groupings help discern how justice framings have evolved and how they are used in strategic ways to advance interests in multilateral forums.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
epub
subject
keywords
climate change negotiations, critical discourse analysis, Climate justice, conference of the parties, non-state actors, UNFCCC
in
Critical Policy Studies
publisher
Routledge
external identifiers
  • scopus:85165473738
ISSN
1946-0171
DOI
10.1080/19460171.2023.2235405
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
f8b27a96-ff34-4c53-99e1-514e4976c38e
date added to LUP
2023-09-19 10:08:04
date last changed
2023-09-19 10:08:04
@article{f8b27a96-ff34-4c53-99e1-514e4976c38e,
  abstract     = {{<p>A growing body of research suggests that the global conception of climate change is increasingly taking a justice-focus. However, the justice-framings of different actors in the UNFCCC process and their evolution have not yet been examined. We conduct a critical discourse analysis of climate justice claims of state and non-state actors in COP15, COP19, COP21 and COP24 which are key moments for climate justice under the UNFCCC. Our findings indicate that the UNFCCC has not delivered on climate justice, power stands out as a key issue in the negotiations, and the negotiations reproduce structures of climate injustice. We identified four new country groupings with different climate justice frames. The Radicals consider climate change an imminent threat, while Opportunists seek to benefit from it. The Hypocrites recognize their contribution to climate change but avoid responsibility through libertarian mechanisms. The Evaders construe justice a normative issue and block others’ justice claims. These groupings help discern how justice framings have evolved and how they are used in strategic ways to advance interests in multilateral forums.</p>}},
  author       = {{Lefstad, Lina and Paavola, Jouni}},
  issn         = {{1946-0171}},
  keywords     = {{climate change negotiations, critical discourse analysis; Climate justice; conference of the parties; non-state actors; UNFCCC}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  publisher    = {{Routledge}},
  series       = {{Critical Policy Studies}},
  title        = {{The evolution of climate justice claims in global climate change negotiations under the UNFCCC}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2023.2235405}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/19460171.2023.2235405}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}