Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Animal names for Hebrew Bible female prophets

Scheuer, Blaženka LU (2017) In Literature and Theology 31(4). p.455-471
Abstract

This article explores the literary and ideological dimensions of zoomorphic names for Deborah (bee) and Huldah (weasel)-two of the Hebrew Bible female prophets. The two women stand out among the female protagonists of the Hebrew Bible in three ways: they are the only female prophets endowed with textual legacy, they are remarkably successful in roles usually reserved for men, and they are the only women named after unclean animals. In this article, I argue that biblical authors use animal names to enhance the characterisation of the two women and to foreshadow the outcome of their narratives. Perceived as a bee, Deborah emerges as a triumphant weapon of war launched against the enemies of her people. Perceived as a weasel, Huldah... (More)

This article explores the literary and ideological dimensions of zoomorphic names for Deborah (bee) and Huldah (weasel)-two of the Hebrew Bible female prophets. The two women stand out among the female protagonists of the Hebrew Bible in three ways: they are the only female prophets endowed with textual legacy, they are remarkably successful in roles usually reserved for men, and they are the only women named after unclean animals. In this article, I argue that biblical authors use animal names to enhance the characterisation of the two women and to foreshadow the outcome of their narratives. Perceived as a bee, Deborah emerges as a triumphant weapon of war launched against the enemies of her people. Perceived as a weasel, Huldah appears as masterful in finding ways to solve intricate situations. At the same time, the use of names of unclean animals works to undermine the achievements and capacity of the two women, thereby consolidating the divide between male and female roles. Zoomorphic names of unclean animals suggest that although imaginable, and sometimes indispensable, female leadership is essentially extraordinary and must be viewed with suspicion.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Animal-names, Female prophets, Hebrew Bible, Zoomorphic metaphors
in
Literature and Theology
volume
31
issue
4
pages
17 pages
publisher
Oxford University Press
external identifiers
  • wos:000417185100006
  • scopus:85039455834
ISSN
0269-1205
DOI
10.1093/litthe/frx032
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
fa51936b-ccb4-4afd-ad4e-9ce8d45a7a46
date added to LUP
2018-01-08 10:30:28
date last changed
2024-03-01 10:28:05
@article{fa51936b-ccb4-4afd-ad4e-9ce8d45a7a46,
  abstract     = {{<p>This article explores the literary and ideological dimensions of zoomorphic names for Deborah (bee) and Huldah (weasel)-two of the Hebrew Bible female prophets. The two women stand out among the female protagonists of the Hebrew Bible in three ways: they are the only female prophets endowed with textual legacy, they are remarkably successful in roles usually reserved for men, and they are the only women named after unclean animals. In this article, I argue that biblical authors use animal names to enhance the characterisation of the two women and to foreshadow the outcome of their narratives. Perceived as a bee, Deborah emerges as a triumphant weapon of war launched against the enemies of her people. Perceived as a weasel, Huldah appears as masterful in finding ways to solve intricate situations. At the same time, the use of names of unclean animals works to undermine the achievements and capacity of the two women, thereby consolidating the divide between male and female roles. Zoomorphic names of unclean animals suggest that although imaginable, and sometimes indispensable, female leadership is essentially extraordinary and must be viewed with suspicion.</p>}},
  author       = {{Scheuer, Blaženka}},
  issn         = {{0269-1205}},
  keywords     = {{Animal-names; Female prophets; Hebrew Bible; Zoomorphic metaphors}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{12}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{455--471}},
  publisher    = {{Oxford University Press}},
  series       = {{Literature and Theology}},
  title        = {{Animal names for Hebrew Bible female prophets}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/litthe/frx032}},
  doi          = {{10.1093/litthe/frx032}},
  volume       = {{31}},
  year         = {{2017}},
}