11 – 20 of 27
- show: 10
- |
- sort: year (new to old)
Close
Embed this list
<iframe src=" "
width=" "
height=" "
allowtransparency="true"
frameborder="0">
</iframe>
- 2017
-
Mark
Simultaneous patch testing with fragrance mix I, fragrance mix II and their ingredients in southern Sweden between 2009 and 2015
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
- 2016
-
Mark
Concomitant contact allergies to formaldehyde, methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone, methylisothiazolinone, and fragrance mixes I and II
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
-
Mark
Formaldehyde in cosmetics in patch tested dermatitis patients with and without contact allergy to formaldehyde.
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
- 2015
-
Mark
Methylisothiazolinone Contact Allergy is Rising to Alarming Heights Also in Southern Sweden.
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
-
Mark
Skin care products containing low concentrations of formaldehyde detected by the chromotropic acid method can not be safely used in formaldehyde-allergic patients.
2015) In British Journal of Dermatology(
- Contribution to journal › Article
- 2011
-
Mark
Clinically relevant contact allergy to formaldehyde may be missed by testing with formaldehyde 1.0%.
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
- 2010
-
Mark
Comparison of three different techniques for application of water solutions to Finn Chambers®.
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
-
Mark
Routine diagnostic patch-testing with formaldehyde 2.0% (0.6 mg/cm2) may be an advantage compared to 1.0%.
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
- 2008
-
Mark
Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from epoxy resin in a golf club repairman.
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
- 2006
-
Mark
The validity of a questionnaire-based epidemiological study of occupational dermatosis
(
- Contribution to journal › Article