31 – 40 of 60
- show: 10
- |
- sort: year (new to old)
Close
Embed this list
<iframe src=" "
width=" "
height=" "
allowtransparency="true"
frameborder="0">
</iframe>
- 2014
-
Mark
Occupational allergic contact dermatitis to gloves, follow-up of investigated patients
2014) 12th Contress of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis (ESCD) In Contact Dermatitis 70(Suppl s1). p.94-94(
- Contribution to journal › Published meeting abstract
- 2013
-
Mark
Allergic contact dermatitis caused by triphenyl phosphite in poly(vinyl chloride) gloves.
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
-
Mark
Contact allergy to isocyanates after accidental spillage.
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
-
Mark
Recommendation to include formaldehyde 2.0% aqua in the European baseline patch test series.
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
-
Mark
Patch testing with 2.0% (0.60 mg/cm(2) ) formaldehyde instead of 1.0% (0.30 mg/cm(2) ) detects significantly more contact allergy.
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
-
Mark
To Show: apropos of Marcel Duchamp’s Étant donnés: 1° La chute d’eau, 2° Le gaz d’éclairage...
2013)(
- Thesis › Doctoral thesis (monograph)
- 2012
-
Mark
Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by sterile non-latex protective gloves: clinical investigation and chemical analyses.
2012) In Contact Dermatitis(
- Contribution to journal › Article
- 2011
-
Mark
Clinically relevant contact allergy to formaldehyde may be missed by testing with formaldehyde 1.0%.
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
- 2010
-
Mark
Comparison of three different techniques for application of water solutions to Finn Chambers®.
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
-
Mark
Routine diagnostic patch-testing with formaldehyde 2.0% (0.6 mg/cm2) may be an advantage compared to 1.0%.
(
- Contribution to journal › Article