111 – 120 of 167
- show: 10
- |
- sort: year (new to old)
Close
Embed this list
<iframe src=" "
width=" "
height=" "
allowtransparency="true"
frameborder="0">
</iframe>
- 2017
-
Mark
Is accepting circular reasoning in shaken baby studies bad science or misconduct?
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
-
Mark
One oxygen breath shortened the time to return of spontaneous circulation in severely asphyxiated piglets
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
-
Mark
Health consequences of premature birth revisited – what have we learned?
(
- Contribution to journal › Debate/Note/Editorial
-
Mark
The shaken baby syndrome report was not the result of a conspiracy. Response to Dr. Narang et al.
(
- Contribution to journal › Debate/Note/Editorial
-
Mark
What are acceptable conclusions? Response to Dr. Ludvigsson
(
- Contribution to journal › Debate/Note/Editorial
-
Mark
More voice, less noise in NICUs
(
- Contribution to journal › Debate/Note/Editorial
-
Mark
The care of a child with a newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia
(
- Contribution to journal › Debate/Note/Editorial
-
Mark
Parents need support to find ways to optimise their own sleep without seeing their preterm infant's sleeping patterns as a problem
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
-
Mark
Boys have better short-term and long-term survival rates after intensive care admissions than girls
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
-
Mark
Special diets are common among preschool children aged one to five years in south-east Sweden according to a population-based cross-sectional survey
(
- Contribution to journal › Article