1 – 5 of 5
- show: 5
- |
- sort: year (new to old)
Close
Embed this list
<iframe src=" "
width=" "
height=" "
allowtransparency="true"
frameborder="0">
</iframe>
- 2022
-
Mark
Reply to Joep J. de Jong and Ewan A. Gibb's Letter to the Editor re: Gottfrid Sjödahl, Johan Abrahamsson, Karin Holmsten, et al. Different Responses to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Urothelial Carcinoma Molecular Subtypes. Eur Urol. 2022;81:316-7. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Differences in Intrinsic Biology or Subtyping Nomenclature?
(
- Contribution to journal › Letter
-
Mark
Different Responses to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Urothelial Carcinoma Molecular Subtypes
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
- 2015
-
Mark
Reply from Authors re: Bas W.G. van Rhijn, Mark A. Behrendt, Kees Hendricksen, Theo H. van der Kwast. Toward Optimal Prediction of Prognosis in T1 Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder. Eur Urol. In press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.03.030.
(
- Contribution to journal › Debate/Note/Editorial
-
Mark
A Molecular Pathologic Framework for Risk Stratification of Stage T1 Urothelial Carcinoma.
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
- 2012
-
Mark
The Importance of Being Grade 3: WHO 1999 Versus WHO 2004 Pathologic Grading.
(
- Contribution to journal › Article