Implementing E-Invoicing in the European Union: An interpretive analysis of regulatory variation across Member States
(2026) INFM12 20261Department of Informatics
- Abstract
- Mandatory B2B e-invoicing is expanding across the EU under a shared harmonisation agenda, yet Member States have adopted substantially different governance arrangements for how invoices are exchanged, validated, and reported. This thesis investigates how regulation affects the implementation of mandatory B2B e-invoicing and how governance model variation shapes the conditions organisations face during that process. Drawing on document analysis of five Member States and five expert interviews, the study takes an interpretivist and abductive approach. The findings show that regulation is not external to implementation but embedded in it, enacted through format specifications, validation sequences, and transmission architectures. Governance... (More)
- Mandatory B2B e-invoicing is expanding across the EU under a shared harmonisation agenda, yet Member States have adopted substantially different governance arrangements for how invoices are exchanged, validated, and reported. This thesis investigates how regulation affects the implementation of mandatory B2B e-invoicing and how governance model variation shapes the conditions organisations face during that process. Drawing on document analysis of five Member States and five expert interviews, the study takes an interpretivist and abductive approach. The findings show that regulation is not external to implementation but embedded in it, enacted through format specifications, validation sequences, and transmission architectures. Governance model type shapes the enterprise integration challenge: Italy, France, Belgium, Hungary, and Germany each generate structurally different demands on ERP configuration, middleware, and operational compliance. The study contributes a comparative governance typology and shows that cross-jurisdictional implementation burdens cannot be explained without reference to governance model type, organisational maturity, and the temporal specification status of planned reporting obligations. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9241662
- author
- Benjari, Sammy LU and Liebrecht, Noah LU
- supervisor
- organization
- course
- INFM12 20261
- year
- 2026
- type
- H1 - Master's Degree (One Year)
- subject
- keywords
- e-invoicing, digital reporting, enterprise integration, regulation
- language
- English
- id
- 9241662
- date added to LUP
- 2026-06-22 07:22:23
- date last changed
- 2026-06-22 07:22:23
@misc{9241662,
abstract = {{Mandatory B2B e-invoicing is expanding across the EU under a shared harmonisation agenda, yet Member States have adopted substantially different governance arrangements for how invoices are exchanged, validated, and reported. This thesis investigates how regulation affects the implementation of mandatory B2B e-invoicing and how governance model variation shapes the conditions organisations face during that process. Drawing on document analysis of five Member States and five expert interviews, the study takes an interpretivist and abductive approach. The findings show that regulation is not external to implementation but embedded in it, enacted through format specifications, validation sequences, and transmission architectures. Governance model type shapes the enterprise integration challenge: Italy, France, Belgium, Hungary, and Germany each generate structurally different demands on ERP configuration, middleware, and operational compliance. The study contributes a comparative governance typology and shows that cross-jurisdictional implementation burdens cannot be explained without reference to governance model type, organisational maturity, and the temporal specification status of planned reporting obligations.}},
author = {{Benjari, Sammy and Liebrecht, Noah}},
language = {{eng}},
note = {{Student Paper}},
title = {{Implementing E-Invoicing in the European Union: An interpretive analysis of regulatory variation across Member States}},
year = {{2026}},
}