The Alevi-Bektasi Legacy: Problems of Acquisition and Explanation
(1997) In Lund Studies in History of Religions- Abstract
- Mystics and amateur politicians in the margin of Turkish society.
The specific case of marginalisation in the specific context of my choice provides a wealth of details to be accounted for. All details taken together are real life itself and can thus not be accounted for in a book. Enough can be said, however, about marginalisation in general in order for a meaningful discussion to take place. But generalisations make the problem of choosing and interpreting information poignant. I have dealt at length with this problem. Also when one talks about real life, instead of living it, the problem of talking in a meaningful manner comes to the fore. One might wonder what it is that makes statements meaningful and if meaning is... (More) - Mystics and amateur politicians in the margin of Turkish society.
The specific case of marginalisation in the specific context of my choice provides a wealth of details to be accounted for. All details taken together are real life itself and can thus not be accounted for in a book. Enough can be said, however, about marginalisation in general in order for a meaningful discussion to take place. But generalisations make the problem of choosing and interpreting information poignant. I have dealt at length with this problem. Also when one talks about real life, instead of living it, the problem of talking in a meaningful manner comes to the fore. One might wonder what it is that makes statements meaningful and if meaning is static. And is it more meaningful to talk from a marginal position than from the center? Do the Alevis gain from their marginal position when they speak their (collective) mind? Why do the Bektasis feel they gain from their marginal position even if they keep silent? These questions, and others, are not answered in this thesis, but I have provided som arguments for a set of ideas concerning these questions and also concerning how to deal with these questions. (Less) - Abstract (Swedish)
- Popular Abstract in Swedish
Det mystika arvet: om konsten att erhålla och förklara det (och förstå litegrann): Ett turkiskt exempel.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/18106
- author
- Ataseven, Ilhan LU
- supervisor
- opponent
-
- Ph.D. Larsen, Kjersti, Oslo
- organization
- publishing date
- 1997
- type
- Thesis
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Teologi, Theology, Religion, Science, Irrational, Rational, Bektasi, Alevi, Turkey, Sufism
- in
- Lund Studies in History of Religions
- pages
- 272 pages
- publisher
- Almqvist & Wiksell International
- defense location
- Theological Inst. Lund
- defense date
- 1997-09-25 10:15:00
- external identifiers
-
- other:ISRN: LUHFDA/HFRH--97/1017--SE+272
- ISSN
- 1103-4882
- ISBN
- 91-22-01765-8
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- additional info
- The information about affiliations in this record was updated in December 2015. The record was previously connected to the following departments: History and Anthropology of Religions (015017025)
- id
- 20d5b112-7125-4214-b104-d14d393c6ad1 (old id 18106)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 15:44:46
- date last changed
- 2019-05-21 19:47:37
@phdthesis{20d5b112-7125-4214-b104-d14d393c6ad1, abstract = {{Mystics and amateur politicians in the margin of Turkish society.<br/><br> <br/><br> The specific case of marginalisation in the specific context of my choice provides a wealth of details to be accounted for. All details taken together are real life itself and can thus not be accounted for in a book. Enough can be said, however, about marginalisation in general in order for a meaningful discussion to take place. But generalisations make the problem of choosing and interpreting information poignant. I have dealt at length with this problem. Also when one talks about real life, instead of living it, the problem of talking in a meaningful manner comes to the fore. One might wonder what it is that makes statements meaningful and if meaning is static. And is it more meaningful to talk from a marginal position than from the center? Do the Alevis gain from their marginal position when they speak their (collective) mind? Why do the Bektasis feel they gain from their marginal position even if they keep silent? These questions, and others, are not answered in this thesis, but I have provided som arguments for a set of ideas concerning these questions and also concerning how to deal with these questions.}}, author = {{Ataseven, Ilhan}}, isbn = {{91-22-01765-8}}, issn = {{1103-4882}}, keywords = {{Teologi; Theology; Religion; Science; Irrational; Rational; Bektasi; Alevi; Turkey; Sufism}}, language = {{eng}}, publisher = {{Almqvist & Wiksell International}}, school = {{Lund University}}, series = {{Lund Studies in History of Religions}}, title = {{The Alevi-Bektasi Legacy: Problems of Acquisition and Explanation}}, year = {{1997}}, }