A meta-analysis of the relation between creative self-efficacy and different creativity measurements
(2018) In Creativity Research Journal 30(1). p.1-16- Abstract
- This meta-analysis investigated the relations between creative self-efficacy (CSE) and creativity measures and hypothesized that self-assessed questionnaires would have a different relation to self-efficacy beliefs compared to other creativity tests. The meta-analysis synthesized 60 effect sizes from 41 papers (overall N = 17226). Taken as a whole, the relation between CSE and creativity measures was of medium size (r = .39). Subgroup analyses revealed that self-rated creativity correlated higher with self-efficacy (r = .53). The relation with divergent thinking (DT) tests was weak (r = .23). Creativity scales had a medium size relation (r = .43), and was stronger than the relation to verbal performance tasks (r = .27) and figural... (More)
- This meta-analysis investigated the relations between creative self-efficacy (CSE) and creativity measures and hypothesized that self-assessed questionnaires would have a different relation to self-efficacy beliefs compared to other creativity tests. The meta-analysis synthesized 60 effect sizes from 41 papers (overall N = 17226). Taken as a whole, the relation between CSE and creativity measures was of medium size (r = .39). Subgroup analyses revealed that self-rated creativity correlated higher with self-efficacy (r = .53). The relation with divergent thinking (DT) tests was weak (r = .23). Creativity scales had a medium size relation (r = .43), and was stronger than the relation to verbal performance tasks (r = .27) and figural performance tasks (r = .19). In a comparison between measures focusing on the creative person (r = .47), the creative product (r = .32), and the creative process (r = .27), the person aspect was most strongly linked to CSE. Thus, the relation between self-efficacy and creativity measures is dependent on the type of measurement used, emphasizing the need for researchers to distinguish between different instruments—not the least between self-report scales and more objective test procedures. Conceptual implications are discussed and critique concerning the creativity concept is brought up. (Less)
- Abstract (Swedish)
- The present meta-analysis investigated the relations between creative self-efficacy (CSE) and creativity measures and hypothesized that self-assessed questionnaires would have a different relation to self-efficacy beliefs compared to other creativity tests. The meta-analysis synthesized 60 effect sizes from 41 papers (overall N = 17226). Taken as a whole, the relation between CSE and creativity measures was of medium size (r = .39). Subgroup analyses revealed that self-rated creativity correlated higher with self-efficacy (r = .53). The relation with divergent thinking tests was weak (r = .23). Creativity scales had a medium size relation (r = .43), and was stronger than the relation to verbal performance tasks (r = .27) and figural... (More)
- The present meta-analysis investigated the relations between creative self-efficacy (CSE) and creativity measures and hypothesized that self-assessed questionnaires would have a different relation to self-efficacy beliefs compared to other creativity tests. The meta-analysis synthesized 60 effect sizes from 41 papers (overall N = 17226). Taken as a whole, the relation between CSE and creativity measures was of medium size (r = .39). Subgroup analyses revealed that self-rated creativity correlated higher with self-efficacy (r = .53). The relation with divergent thinking tests was weak (r = .23). Creativity scales had a medium size relation (r = .43), and was stronger than the relation to verbal performance tasks (r = .27) and figural performance tasks (r = .19). In a comparison between measures focusing on the creative person (r = .47), the creative product (r = .32), and the creative process (r = .27), the person aspect was most strongly linked to CSE. Thus, the relation between self-efficacy and creativity measures is dependent on the type of measurement used, emphasizing the need for researchers to distinguish between different instruments – not the least between self-report scales and more objective test procedures. Conceptual implications are discussed and critique concerning the creativity concept is brought up. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/8e3ca301-0835-45b7-9047-db8aa62f4b9c
- author
- Haase, Jennifer ; Hoff, Eva LU ; Hanel, Paul and Innes-Ker, Åse LU
- organization
- alternative title
- En metaanalys av relationen mellan kreativ self-efficacy och olika kreativitetsmått
- publishing date
- 2018-01-30
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Creativity, Self-Efficacy, Creative Self-efficacy, Meta-Analysis, Creativity Measures, Creativity Tests
- in
- Creativity Research Journal
- volume
- 30
- issue
- 1
- pages
- 1 - 16
- publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85041302410
- ISSN
- 1040-0419
- DOI
- 10.1080/10400419.2018.1411436
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 8e3ca301-0835-45b7-9047-db8aa62f4b9c
- date added to LUP
- 2017-10-23 11:13:12
- date last changed
- 2022-04-25 03:09:37
@article{8e3ca301-0835-45b7-9047-db8aa62f4b9c,
abstract = {{This meta-analysis investigated the relations between creative self-efficacy (CSE) and creativity measures and hypothesized that self-assessed questionnaires would have a different relation to self-efficacy beliefs compared to other creativity tests. The meta-analysis synthesized 60 effect sizes from 41 papers (overall N = 17226). Taken as a whole, the relation between CSE and creativity measures was of medium size (r = .39). Subgroup analyses revealed that self-rated creativity correlated higher with self-efficacy (r = .53). The relation with divergent thinking (DT) tests was weak (r = .23). Creativity scales had a medium size relation (r = .43), and was stronger than the relation to verbal performance tasks (r = .27) and figural performance tasks (r = .19). In a comparison between measures focusing on the creative person (r = .47), the creative product (r = .32), and the creative process (r = .27), the person aspect was most strongly linked to CSE. Thus, the relation between self-efficacy and creativity measures is dependent on the type of measurement used, emphasizing the need for researchers to distinguish between different instruments—not the least between self-report scales and more objective test procedures. Conceptual implications are discussed and critique concerning the creativity concept is brought up.}},
author = {{Haase, Jennifer and Hoff, Eva and Hanel, Paul and Innes-Ker, Åse}},
issn = {{1040-0419}},
keywords = {{Creativity; Self-Efficacy; Creative Self-efficacy; Meta-Analysis; Creativity Measures; Creativity Tests}},
language = {{eng}},
month = {{01}},
number = {{1}},
pages = {{1--16}},
publisher = {{Taylor & Francis}},
series = {{Creativity Research Journal}},
title = {{A meta-analysis of the relation between creative self-efficacy and different creativity measurements}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1411436}},
doi = {{10.1080/10400419.2018.1411436}},
volume = {{30}},
year = {{2018}},
}