Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the Functional Disability Inventory

Clifford-Lind, Maria and Tornberg, Åsa LU orcid (2015) In European Journal of Physiotherapy 17(3). p.116-122
Abstract
Chronic or recurrent pain is a common experience in children and adolescents. One questionnaire that is frequently used to assess pain-related disability is the Functional Disability Inventory (FDI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the FDI. The patient group consisted of 30 patients, 8-17 years old. The comparison group consisted of 78 pupils, 8-17 years old. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation (ICC). Validity was assessed in terms of construct validity and face validity. To assess construct validity, Spearman's rho was used. Internal consistency reliability was high, with Cronbach's α = 0.90. Similarly, test-retest reliability was good, with... (More)
Chronic or recurrent pain is a common experience in children and adolescents. One questionnaire that is frequently used to assess pain-related disability is the Functional Disability Inventory (FDI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the FDI. The patient group consisted of 30 patients, 8-17 years old. The comparison group consisted of 78 pupils, 8-17 years old. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation (ICC). Validity was assessed in terms of construct validity and face validity. To assess construct validity, Spearman's rho was used. Internal consistency reliability was high, with Cronbach's α = 0.90. Similarly, test-retest reliability was good, with an ICC of 0.90 (95% confidence interval 0.78-0.95). Concerning interrater reliability, the result was good, with an ICC of 0.67. Construct validity correlations, assessed using Spearman's rho, were significant. Most participants (85.7%) did not report any areas in their everyday lives where they experienced any disabilities not covered in the FDI, indicating acceptable face validity. In this context and used in this population, the results indicate that the FDI is a reliable and valid questionnaire for assessing pain-related disability in children and adolescents. © 2015 Informa Healthcare. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
European Journal of Physiotherapy
volume
17
issue
3
pages
6 pages
publisher
Informa Healthcare
external identifiers
  • scopus:84937539593
  • wos:000217425200003
ISSN
2167-9177
DOI
10.3109/21679169.2015.1046486
project
Träning och tester inom idrott och hälsa
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
9287c050-caaa-42da-823a-80faf9c6c417
date added to LUP
2017-04-13 14:03:26
date last changed
2023-04-28 14:26:30
@article{9287c050-caaa-42da-823a-80faf9c6c417,
  abstract     = {{Chronic or recurrent pain is a common experience in children and adolescents. One questionnaire that is frequently used to assess pain-related disability is the Functional Disability Inventory (FDI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the FDI. The patient group consisted of 30 patients, 8-17 years old. The comparison group consisted of 78 pupils, 8-17 years old. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation (ICC). Validity was assessed in terms of construct validity and face validity. To assess construct validity, Spearman's rho was used. Internal consistency reliability was high, with Cronbach's α = 0.90. Similarly, test-retest reliability was good, with an ICC of 0.90 (95% confidence interval 0.78-0.95). Concerning interrater reliability, the result was good, with an ICC of 0.67. Construct validity correlations, assessed using Spearman's rho, were significant. Most participants (85.7%) did not report any areas in their everyday lives where they experienced any disabilities not covered in the FDI, indicating acceptable face validity. In this context and used in this population, the results indicate that the FDI is a reliable and valid questionnaire for assessing pain-related disability in children and adolescents. © 2015 Informa Healthcare.}},
  author       = {{Clifford-Lind, Maria and Tornberg, Åsa}},
  issn         = {{2167-9177}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{116--122}},
  publisher    = {{Informa Healthcare}},
  series       = {{European Journal of Physiotherapy}},
  title        = {{Psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the Functional Disability Inventory}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/21679169.2015.1046486}},
  doi          = {{10.3109/21679169.2015.1046486}},
  volume       = {{17}},
  year         = {{2015}},
}