Comparison Between Robust PID and Predictive PI Controllers with Constrained Control Signal Noise Sensitivity
(2012) IFAC Conference on Advances in PID Control p.175-180- Abstract
- A performance comparison between PID and predictive PI (PPI) controllers, i.e., two different prediction methods, is presented. Optimization of controller and measurement filter parameters, considering load disturbance rejection, robustness and noise sensitivity, is performed for a batch of industrially representative processes. For a majority of the processes and the constraints chosen, results show that the performances of the controllers are similar. However, the PID controller yields better performance for processes where increased phase and gain may be achieved over a wider frequency interval than what is possible by the PPI controller.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/2295626
- author
- Larsson, Per-Ola LU and Hägglund, Tore LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2012
- type
- Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- PID, predictive PI, optimization, noise sensitivity, robustness
- host publication
- 2nd IFAC Conference on Advances in PID Control 2012
- pages
- 175 - 180
- publisher
- Elsevier
- conference name
- IFAC Conference on Advances in PID Control
- conference location
- Brescia, Italy
- conference dates
- 2012-03-28
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:84880902524
- ISBN
- 9781627483247
- project
- PID Control
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- additional info
- key=lars_hagg2012PID
- id
- bd8c26cf-e943-4094-8cb6-2d7ca2ce8cb3 (old id 2295626)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-04 12:06:04
- date last changed
- 2024-01-28 01:00:17
@inproceedings{bd8c26cf-e943-4094-8cb6-2d7ca2ce8cb3, abstract = {{A performance comparison between PID and predictive PI (PPI) controllers, i.e., two different prediction methods, is presented. Optimization of controller and measurement filter parameters, considering load disturbance rejection, robustness and noise sensitivity, is performed for a batch of industrially representative processes. For a majority of the processes and the constraints chosen, results show that the performances of the controllers are similar. However, the PID controller yields better performance for processes where increased phase and gain may be achieved over a wider frequency interval than what is possible by the PPI controller.}}, author = {{Larsson, Per-Ola and Hägglund, Tore}}, booktitle = {{2nd IFAC Conference on Advances in PID Control 2012}}, isbn = {{9781627483247}}, keywords = {{PID; predictive PI; optimization; noise sensitivity; robustness}}, language = {{eng}}, pages = {{175--180}}, publisher = {{Elsevier}}, title = {{Comparison Between Robust PID and Predictive PI Controllers with Constrained Control Signal Noise Sensitivity}}, year = {{2012}}, }