Advanced

Conceptual spaces at work in sensuous cognition: Domains, dimensions and distances.

Paradis, Carita LU (2015) In Applications of Conceptual spaces: Geometric knowledge representation p.33-55
Abstract
This chapter makes use of wine reviews for the investigation of how experiences of sensory perceptions of VISION, SMELL, TASTE and TOUCH are described. In spite of all the great challenges involved in describing perceptions, professional wine reviewers are expected to be able to give an understandable account of their experiences. The reviews are explored with focus on the different types of descriptors and the ways their meanings are construed. It gives an account of the use of both property expressions, such as soft, sharp, sweet and dry and object descriptors, such as blueberry, apple and honey. It pays particular attention to the apparent cross-sensory use of descriptors, such as white aromas and soft smell, arguing that the... (More)
This chapter makes use of wine reviews for the investigation of how experiences of sensory perceptions of VISION, SMELL, TASTE and TOUCH are described. In spite of all the great challenges involved in describing perceptions, professional wine reviewers are expected to be able to give an understandable account of their experiences. The reviews are explored with focus on the different types of descriptors and the ways their meanings are construed. It gives an account of the use of both property expressions, such as soft, sharp, sweet and dry and object descriptors, such as blueberry, apple and honey. It pays particular attention to the apparent cross-sensory use of descriptors, such as white aromas and soft smell, arguing that the ontological cross-over of sensory modalities are to be considered as symptoms of ‘synesthesia’ in the wine-tasting practice and monosemy at the conceptual level. In contrast to the standard view of the meanings of words for sensory perceptions, the contention is that it is not the case that, for instance, sharp in sharp smell primarily evokes a notion of touch; rather the sensory experiences are strongly interrelated in cogni-tion. When instantiated in, say SMELL, soft spans the closely related sense domains, and the lexical syncretism is taken to be grounded in the workings of human sensory cognition. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
publication status
published
subject
keywords
vision, smell, taste, touch, sensory perceptions, cross-sensory descriptions, sense, ontologies, construals
in
Applications of Conceptual spaces: Geometric knowledge representation
editor
Zenker, Frank and Gärdenfors, Peter
pages
33 - 55
publisher
Springer
external identifiers
  • Scopus:84943796267
ISBN
978-3-319-15020-8
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-15021-5_3
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
18d5ced6-8d0b-4cb3-a1e8-db4f888bc5c9 (old id 4131527)
date added to LUP
2013-11-07 09:26:44
date last changed
2016-10-13 04:38:24
@misc{18d5ced6-8d0b-4cb3-a1e8-db4f888bc5c9,
  abstract     = {This chapter makes use of wine reviews for the investigation of how experiences of sensory perceptions of VISION, SMELL, TASTE and TOUCH are described. In spite of all the great challenges involved in describing perceptions, professional wine reviewers are expected to be able to give an understandable account of their experiences. The reviews are explored with focus on the different types of descriptors and the ways their meanings are construed. It gives an account of the use of both property expressions, such as soft, sharp, sweet and dry and object descriptors, such as blueberry, apple and honey. It pays particular attention to the apparent cross-sensory use of descriptors, such as white aromas and soft smell, arguing that the ontological cross-over of sensory modalities are to be considered as symptoms of ‘synesthesia’ in the wine-tasting practice and monosemy at the conceptual level. In contrast to the standard view of the meanings of words for sensory perceptions, the contention is that it is not the case that, for instance, sharp in sharp smell primarily evokes a notion of touch; rather the sensory experiences are strongly interrelated in cogni-tion. When instantiated in, say SMELL, soft spans the closely related sense domains, and the lexical syncretism is taken to be grounded in the workings of human sensory cognition.},
  author       = {Paradis, Carita},
  editor       = {Zenker, Frank and Gärdenfors, Peter},
  isbn         = {978-3-319-15020-8},
  keyword      = {vision,smell,taste,touch,sensory perceptions,cross-sensory descriptions,sense,ontologies,construals},
  language     = {eng},
  pages        = {33--55},
  publisher    = {ARRAY(0xc837e70)},
  series       = {Applications of Conceptual spaces: Geometric knowledge representation},
  title        = {Conceptual spaces at work in sensuous cognition: Domains, dimensions and distances.},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15021-5_3},
  year         = {2015},
}