Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Naming Rights and Naming Wrongs. An analysis of football fan communities and their evolving attitude towards stadium branding practices

Cordenons, Alberto LU and Stoimenov, Georgi LU (2017) BUSN39 20171
Department of Business Administration
Abstract
This study seeks to provide an up-to-date analysis of how fandom communities perceive the stadium naming rights phenomenon. In order to gather empirical material which includes both a hypothetical and a retrospective perspective, the research is comprised of two independent cases. Focus groups and semi-structured interviews were the selected data collection methods, while the empirical data was analysed through a combination of hermeneutics and a model developed by Richard Giulianotti (2002).

The research findings unveiled an evolving attitude towards the stadium branding practices – in general terms, the fandom presents a decreasing, but conditional, element of disapproval. In order for the community to cope with a sponsor-influenced... (More)
This study seeks to provide an up-to-date analysis of how fandom communities perceive the stadium naming rights phenomenon. In order to gather empirical material which includes both a hypothetical and a retrospective perspective, the research is comprised of two independent cases. Focus groups and semi-structured interviews were the selected data collection methods, while the empirical data was analysed through a combination of hermeneutics and a model developed by Richard Giulianotti (2002).

The research findings unveiled an evolving attitude towards the stadium branding practices – in general terms, the fandom presents a decreasing, but conditional, element of disapproval. In order for the community to cope with a sponsor-influenced home ground name, a sponsor-stadium fit is a main prerequisite which needs to be ensured. When this requirement is considered, the majority of the community would consent to adopting a coping stance, rather than actively resisting the naming rights agreement.

Despite the increasing element of acceptance, this research has discovered and developed certain elements which would be an unconditional resistance triggers - the concept of topophilia representing the strong notion of rejecting the possibility of a relocation, even when considering an infrastructural improvement. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Cordenons, Alberto LU and Stoimenov, Georgi LU
supervisor
organization
course
BUSN39 20171
year
type
H1 - Master's Degree (One Year)
subject
keywords
trade-off, topophilia, coping mechanism, anchoring theory, resistance triggers, authenticity, corporate sponsorship, naming rights, Stadium branding, sponsor-stadium fit
language
English
id
8920794
date added to LUP
2017-07-03 16:37:53
date last changed
2017-07-03 16:37:53
@misc{8920794,
  abstract     = {{This study seeks to provide an up-to-date analysis of how fandom communities perceive the stadium naming rights phenomenon. In order to gather empirical material which includes both a hypothetical and a retrospective perspective, the research is comprised of two independent cases. Focus groups and semi-structured interviews were the selected data collection methods, while the empirical data was analysed through a combination of hermeneutics and a model developed by Richard Giulianotti (2002).

The research findings unveiled an evolving attitude towards the stadium branding practices – in general terms, the fandom presents a decreasing, but conditional, element of disapproval. In order for the community to cope with a sponsor-influenced home ground name, a sponsor-stadium fit is a main prerequisite which needs to be ensured. When this requirement is considered, the majority of the community would consent to adopting a coping stance, rather than actively resisting the naming rights agreement.

Despite the increasing element of acceptance, this research has discovered and developed certain elements which would be an unconditional resistance triggers - the concept of topophilia representing the strong notion of rejecting the possibility of a relocation, even when considering an infrastructural improvement.}},
  author       = {{Cordenons, Alberto and Stoimenov, Georgi}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  title        = {{Naming Rights and Naming Wrongs. An analysis of football fan communities and their evolving attitude towards stadium branding practices}},
  year         = {{2017}},
}