Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Domesticating technology : Sociotechnical imaginaries of carbon capture and storage in Denmark

Hougaard, Inge Merete LU and Christiansen, Kirstine Lund LU (2025) In Energy Research and Social Science 125.
Abstract

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has in recent years gained new attention in national and corporate strategies for achieving climate goals. This is for instance seen in Denmark, where CCS was positioned as the largest single mitigation tool in the 2020 Climate Programme. As an example of how international imaginaries of mitigation technologies translate into national settings, this paper explores how CCS was brought into, adapted and adopted in Danish climate policy. Drawing on document analysis, webinar observation and semi-structured interviews, we identity four arguments (necessity, ability, capacity and opportunity) that various actors mobilise to develop a shared sociotechnical imaginary of a CCS-dependent climate future. These... (More)

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has in recent years gained new attention in national and corporate strategies for achieving climate goals. This is for instance seen in Denmark, where CCS was positioned as the largest single mitigation tool in the 2020 Climate Programme. As an example of how international imaginaries of mitigation technologies translate into national settings, this paper explores how CCS was brought into, adapted and adopted in Danish climate policy. Drawing on document analysis, webinar observation and semi-structured interviews, we identity four arguments (necessity, ability, capacity and opportunity) that various actors mobilise to develop a shared sociotechnical imaginary of a CCS-dependent climate future. These arguments are supported by maps and numbers that act as objective truths, serve performative roles and legitimise the future imaginary. We argue that maps and numbers function as tools for domesticating CCS in three ways: nationalising, utilising and controlling technology as well as the opposition to it. We conclude that maps and numbers, through domestication, naturalise and depoliticise the STI of a CCS-dependent future. While this may not be intentional by the actors involved, it illustrates the ability of artefacts and arguments to devise specific techno-political pathways.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Carbon dioxide removal (CDR), Geological CO-storage, Negative emissions technologies (NETs), Net-zero, Political ecology, Science and technology studies (STS)
in
Energy Research and Social Science
volume
125
article number
104087
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • scopus:105003399615
ISSN
2214-6296
DOI
10.1016/j.erss.2025.104087
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
3e7d3055-1c93-484c-aa40-247cbb220acd
date added to LUP
2025-07-17 10:08:49
date last changed
2025-07-17 10:08:55
@article{3e7d3055-1c93-484c-aa40-247cbb220acd,
  abstract     = {{<p>Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has in recent years gained new attention in national and corporate strategies for achieving climate goals. This is for instance seen in Denmark, where CCS was positioned as the largest single mitigation tool in the 2020 Climate Programme. As an example of how international imaginaries of mitigation technologies translate into national settings, this paper explores how CCS was brought into, adapted and adopted in Danish climate policy. Drawing on document analysis, webinar observation and semi-structured interviews, we identity four arguments (necessity, ability, capacity and opportunity) that various actors mobilise to develop a shared sociotechnical imaginary of a CCS-dependent climate future. These arguments are supported by maps and numbers that act as objective truths, serve performative roles and legitimise the future imaginary. We argue that maps and numbers function as tools for domesticating CCS in three ways: nationalising, utilising and controlling technology as well as the opposition to it. We conclude that maps and numbers, through domestication, naturalise and depoliticise the STI of a CCS-dependent future. While this may not be intentional by the actors involved, it illustrates the ability of artefacts and arguments to devise specific techno-political pathways.</p>}},
  author       = {{Hougaard, Inge Merete and Christiansen, Kirstine Lund}},
  issn         = {{2214-6296}},
  keywords     = {{Carbon dioxide removal (CDR); Geological CO-storage; Negative emissions technologies (NETs); Net-zero; Political ecology; Science and technology studies (STS)}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  series       = {{Energy Research and Social Science}},
  title        = {{Domesticating technology : Sociotechnical imaginaries of carbon capture and storage in Denmark}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104087}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.erss.2025.104087}},
  volume       = {{125}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}