Evaluation of breathing interplay effects during VMAT by using 3D gel measurements
Ceberg, Sofie LU ; Ceberg, Crister LU
; Falk, M.
; af Rosenschold, P. Munk
and Bäck, Sven
LU
(2013)
7th International Conference on 3D Radiation Dosimetry (IC3DDose)
444.
p.012098-012098
- Abstract
- Respiratory motion during dynamic radiotherapy may affect the absorbed dose distribution both by dose-reducing smoothing and by more complicated interplay effects. In this study we present a novel method to determine the relative importance of these two effects. For the two dynamic deliveries studied in this work, the expected target dose reduction due to the smoothing effect was estimated by measurements convolved by the motion function. Remaining absorbed dose differences were attributed to interplay effects between the motion of the gel phantom and the movement of the modulating MLC leaves during modulated arc radiotherapy. The total dosimetric effect due to breathing motion and dynamic MLC motion during VMAT delivery resulted in an... (More)
- Respiratory motion during dynamic radiotherapy may affect the absorbed dose distribution both by dose-reducing smoothing and by more complicated interplay effects. In this study we present a novel method to determine the relative importance of these two effects. For the two dynamic deliveries studied in this work, the expected target dose reduction due to the smoothing effect was estimated by measurements convolved by the motion function. Remaining absorbed dose differences were attributed to interplay effects between the motion of the gel phantom and the movement of the modulating MLC leaves during modulated arc radiotherapy. The total dosimetric effect due to breathing motion and dynamic MLC motion during VMAT delivery resulted in an average of about 4% target dose reduction. Comparing with only the smoothing effect, the average difference was decreased to around 1%, and the remaining distribution was attributed to interplay effects. Although the interplay effects were small compared to the smoothing effect, the standard deviations of 1.4-2.3% (1SD) were larger than the narrow distribution for repeated stationary measurement with a standard deviation between 0.5-0.9% (1SD). (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/4027071
- author
- Ceberg, Sofie
LU
; Ceberg, Crister
LU
; Falk, M.
; af Rosenschold, P. Munk
and Bäck, Sven
LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2013
- type
- Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
- publication status
- published
- subject
- host publication
- 7th International Conference on 3D Radiation Dosimetry (IC3DDose)
- volume
- 444
- pages
- 012098 - 012098
- publisher
- IOP Publishing
- conference name
- 7th International Conference on 3D Radiation Dosimetry (IC3DDose)
- conference location
- Sydney, Australia
- conference dates
- 2012-11-04 - 2012-11-08
- external identifiers
-
- wos:000322968600098
- scopus:84883401595
- ISSN
- 1742-6596
- 1742-6588
- DOI
- 10.1088/1742-6596/444/1/012098
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 51ae4453-7e2b-40d1-b589-79cc9dd5809e (old id 4027071)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 10:39:15
- date last changed
- 2024-04-21 17:28:17
@inproceedings{51ae4453-7e2b-40d1-b589-79cc9dd5809e,
abstract = {{Respiratory motion during dynamic radiotherapy may affect the absorbed dose distribution both by dose-reducing smoothing and by more complicated interplay effects. In this study we present a novel method to determine the relative importance of these two effects. For the two dynamic deliveries studied in this work, the expected target dose reduction due to the smoothing effect was estimated by measurements convolved by the motion function. Remaining absorbed dose differences were attributed to interplay effects between the motion of the gel phantom and the movement of the modulating MLC leaves during modulated arc radiotherapy. The total dosimetric effect due to breathing motion and dynamic MLC motion during VMAT delivery resulted in an average of about 4% target dose reduction. Comparing with only the smoothing effect, the average difference was decreased to around 1%, and the remaining distribution was attributed to interplay effects. Although the interplay effects were small compared to the smoothing effect, the standard deviations of 1.4-2.3% (1SD) were larger than the narrow distribution for repeated stationary measurement with a standard deviation between 0.5-0.9% (1SD).}},
author = {{Ceberg, Sofie and Ceberg, Crister and Falk, M. and af Rosenschold, P. Munk and Bäck, Sven}},
booktitle = {{7th International Conference on 3D Radiation Dosimetry (IC3DDose)}},
issn = {{1742-6596}},
language = {{eng}},
pages = {{012098--012098}},
publisher = {{IOP Publishing}},
title = {{Evaluation of breathing interplay effects during VMAT by using 3D gel measurements}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/444/1/012098}},
doi = {{10.1088/1742-6596/444/1/012098}},
volume = {{444}},
year = {{2013}},
}