Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Modeling and Performance Analysis of Alternative Heat Exchangers for Heavy Vehicles

Lin, Wamei LU (2014)
Abstract
Cross flow heat exchangers made from aluminum are common as radiators in vehicles. However, due to the increasing power requirement and the limited available space in vehicles, it is extremely difficult to increase the size of heat exchangers (HEXs) placed in the front of vehicles. Placing the heat exchanger on the roof or at the underbody of vehicles might offer opportunity to increase the size of the heat exchangers. A new configuration of heat exchangers has to be developed to accommodate the position change. In this study, a countercurrent heat exchanger is proposed for the position on the roof of the vehicle compartment. Furthermore, a new material, graphite foam having high thermal conductivity (1700 W/(m•K)) and low density (0.2 to... (More)
Cross flow heat exchangers made from aluminum are common as radiators in vehicles. However, due to the increasing power requirement and the limited available space in vehicles, it is extremely difficult to increase the size of heat exchangers (HEXs) placed in the front of vehicles. Placing the heat exchanger on the roof or at the underbody of vehicles might offer opportunity to increase the size of the heat exchangers. A new configuration of heat exchangers has to be developed to accommodate the position change. In this study, a countercurrent heat exchanger is proposed for the position on the roof of the vehicle compartment. Furthermore, a new material, graphite foam having high thermal conductivity (1700 W/(m•K)) and low density (0.2 to 0.6 g/cm3), is introduced as a potential material for those heat exchangers in vehicles.

In order to find an appropriate configuration of fins with high thermal performance and low pressure loss on the air side for a countercurrent flow HEX, the main-flow enhancement and the secondary-flow enhancement methods are employed to analyze different configurations of fins. The main-flow enhancement cases included are (1) aluminum: louver-, wavy-, and pin fin; (2) graphite foam: corrugated-, wavy corrugated-, pin-finned-, and baffle fin. The secondary-flow enhancement cases included are graphite foam: rectangular fin, rectangular fin with one-side dimples, and rectangular fin with two-side dimples. The computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approach is applied for the comparative studies by using the ANSYS FLUENT software. Moreover, the simulation results are verified by experimental results from literature.

After comparing the performance among different configurations of fin, it is found that the aluminum louver fin shows better performance than the wavy fin and pin fin. Also the graphite foam wavy corrugated fin presents higher heat transfer performance and lower pressure drop than the corrugated-, pin-finned-, and baffle fin. On the other hand, the graphite foam rectangular fin with two-side dimples exhibits better performance than the fin with one-side dimples.

The cross flow HEX (made from aluminum) is compared with countercurrent flow HEXs (made from aluminum or graphite foam), in terms of the coefficient of performance (COP), power density (PD), compactness factor (CF), and energy saving efficiency. Due to the high power density and high compactness factor in the countercurrent flow HEXs, the overall size and weight of the countercurrent flow HEXs are much lower than those of the cross flow HEX. Moreover, the graphite foam wavy corrugated fin provides higher power density and higher compactness factor than an aluminum louver fin because of the high thermal conductivity and low density of the graphite foam. Furthermore, a graphite foam fin with two-side dimples exhibits higher coefficient of performance than an aluminum louver fin, and it becomes very efficient in energy saving. However, due to the high pressure loss in the graphite foam wavy corrugated fin, the air pumping power for the countercurrent flow graphite foam wavy corrugated fin HEX is much higher than that of the cross flow aluminum louver fin HEX.

Based on the presented studies, useful recommendations are highlighted to promote the development of countercurrent flow HEXs and the graphite foam HEXs in vehicles. (Less)
Abstract (Swedish)
Popular Abstract in English

Low fuel consumption, and reduced exhaust emissions, as well as improved performance and durability become much more important than before for the vehicle industry. These requirements lead to a number of additional equipment installed in the vehicles. All these efforts increase the operating temperature in the engine compartment and reduce the available free space in the vehicle. In order to keep the engine working at its optimal condition, a huge amount of heat has to be removed from the engine to the surrounding air. In modern heavy vehicles, this heat is so huge that a conventional heat exchanger (HEX) cannot handle it easily. In addition, more and more electric powertrains are introduced to... (More)
Popular Abstract in English

Low fuel consumption, and reduced exhaust emissions, as well as improved performance and durability become much more important than before for the vehicle industry. These requirements lead to a number of additional equipment installed in the vehicles. All these efforts increase the operating temperature in the engine compartment and reduce the available free space in the vehicle. In order to keep the engine working at its optimal condition, a huge amount of heat has to be removed from the engine to the surrounding air. In modern heavy vehicles, this heat is so huge that a conventional heat exchanger (HEX) cannot handle it easily. In addition, more and more electric powertrains are introduced to heavy vehicles. Because of the increased demand in cooling power, a larger heat exchanger size with a huge cooling surface area is required for the vehicle cooling system. However, the space in such vehicles is limited. It is impossible to increase the size of the conventional HEX to dissipate the required amount of heat from the vehicle. All these factors imply a need for a revolution of the HEX design in vehicles.



Based on literature review, there are two ideas available for developing an alternative heat exchanger for heavy vehicles:

1) Changing the position of heat exchangers: Moving the HEX from the front of the vehicles to the roof of the driver compartment, which might increase the possibility to increase the size of the HEX. Based on the air flowing direction and the engine coolant direction, a countercurrent flow HEX is introduced at the roof position instead of a cross flow HEX.

2) Introducing new materials: Using graphite foam as a thermal material for HEXs in vehicles. Nowadays aluminum HEXs are very common in the vehicle industry. Due to the increasing cooling power and the space limitation in vehicles, a highly compact HEX is required. Graphite foam has even higher thermal conductivity, large specific surface area, and low density. These characteristics imply that graphite foam is a potentially good thermal material for HEXs (instead of the conventional aluminum HEX). However, due to its porous structure, the flow resistance of graphite foam is very high.



In order to find an appropriate fin configuration with good performance in the HEX, a computational method is applied to simulate the performance of the HEX with different fin configurations. The numerical model is verified by experimental results from literature.



The analysis of the results shows:

1) The overall size and weight of a countercurrent flow HEX can be reduced compared to the cross flow HEX because of the high power density and high compactness factor achieved by the countercurrent flow HEX.

2) Because of the high thermal conductivity and low density of the graphite foam, the graphite foam wavy corrugated fin provides higher power density and higher compactness factor than an aluminum louver fin. A graphite foam fin with two-side dimples exhibits higher coefficient of performance (COP) than an aluminum louver fin, and it becomes very efficient in energy saving. Thus, the graphite foam has a very high potential as an alternative material for heat exchanger applications.



The countercurrent flow HEXs made from graphite foam can be designed to be much lighter and smaller than the convectional cross flow aluminum HEXs. A light and compact HEX is not only good for the thermal management of the vehicle, but also it reduces the weight of the vehicle which has an effect on the fuel consumption and overall cost.



The present work is based on a research project "Development of new cooling systems for heavy vehicles - for reduced fuel consumption and lower carbon dioxide emission", which has been financially supported partly by the Swedish Energy Agency (STEM). (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
supervisor
opponent
  • Ghajar, Afshin J., Oklahoma State University, USA
organization
publishing date
type
Thesis
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Countercurrent flow, Graphite foam, Heat exchanger, Thermal performance, Computational fluid dynamics
defense location
Lecture hall B, M-building, Ole Römers väg 1, Lund University Faculty of Engineering
defense date
2014-06-10 10:15:00
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
3b32b8a5-fabf-423d-a7a9-a4ef3fa3a8e6 (old id 4437546)
date added to LUP
2016-04-04 09:23:08
date last changed
2018-11-21 20:52:44
@phdthesis{3b32b8a5-fabf-423d-a7a9-a4ef3fa3a8e6,
  abstract     = {{Cross flow heat exchangers made from aluminum are common as radiators in vehicles. However, due to the increasing power requirement and the limited available space in vehicles, it is extremely difficult to increase the size of heat exchangers (HEXs) placed in the front of vehicles. Placing the heat exchanger on the roof or at the underbody of vehicles might offer opportunity to increase the size of the heat exchangers. A new configuration of heat exchangers has to be developed to accommodate the position change. In this study, a countercurrent heat exchanger is proposed for the position on the roof of the vehicle compartment. Furthermore, a new material, graphite foam having high thermal conductivity (1700 W/(m•K)) and low density (0.2 to 0.6 g/cm3), is introduced as a potential material for those heat exchangers in vehicles. <br/><br>
In order to find an appropriate configuration of fins with high thermal performance and low pressure loss on the air side for a countercurrent flow HEX, the main-flow enhancement and the secondary-flow enhancement methods are employed to analyze different configurations of fins. The main-flow enhancement cases included are (1) aluminum: louver-, wavy-, and pin fin; (2) graphite foam: corrugated-, wavy corrugated-, pin-finned-, and baffle fin. The secondary-flow enhancement cases included are graphite foam: rectangular fin, rectangular fin with one-side dimples, and rectangular fin with two-side dimples. The computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approach is applied for the comparative studies by using the ANSYS FLUENT software. Moreover, the simulation results are verified by experimental results from literature. <br/><br>
After comparing the performance among different configurations of fin, it is found that the aluminum louver fin shows better performance than the wavy fin and pin fin. Also the graphite foam wavy corrugated fin presents higher heat transfer performance and lower pressure drop than the corrugated-, pin-finned-, and baffle fin. On the other hand, the graphite foam rectangular fin with two-side dimples exhibits better performance than the fin with one-side dimples. <br/><br>
The cross flow HEX (made from aluminum) is compared with countercurrent flow HEXs (made from aluminum or graphite foam), in terms of the coefficient of performance (COP), power density (PD), compactness factor (CF), and energy saving efficiency. Due to the high power density and high compactness factor in the countercurrent flow HEXs, the overall size and weight of the countercurrent flow HEXs are much lower than those of the cross flow HEX. Moreover, the graphite foam wavy corrugated fin provides higher power density and higher compactness factor than an aluminum louver fin because of the high thermal conductivity and low density of the graphite foam. Furthermore, a graphite foam fin with two-side dimples exhibits higher coefficient of performance than an aluminum louver fin, and it becomes very efficient in energy saving. However, due to the high pressure loss in the graphite foam wavy corrugated fin, the air pumping power for the countercurrent flow graphite foam wavy corrugated fin HEX is much higher than that of the cross flow aluminum louver fin HEX. <br/><br>
Based on the presented studies, useful recommendations are highlighted to promote the development of countercurrent flow HEXs and the graphite foam HEXs in vehicles.}},
  author       = {{Lin, Wamei}},
  keywords     = {{Countercurrent flow; Graphite foam; Heat exchanger; Thermal performance; Computational fluid dynamics}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  school       = {{Lund University}},
  title        = {{Modeling and Performance Analysis of Alternative Heat Exchangers for Heavy Vehicles}},
  url          = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/5310212/4437549.pdf}},
  year         = {{2014}},
}