Shill Bidding and Information in Sequential Auctions: A Laboratory Study
(2018) In Working Papers- Abstract
- Second-price auctions with public information, such as those on eBay, provide an opportunity for sellers to use the information from finished and ongoing auctions when acting strategically in future auctions. Sellers have frequently been observed to bidding on their own item with the intent to artificially increase its price. This is known as shill bidding. Using lab experiments with two sequential auctions, we study the effect of shill bidding when the seller can choose to shill bid in the second auction. We also study the impact of different information revelation policies regarding the provision of the first auction bidding history to the seller. The experimental data confirm that shill bidding in the second auction affects outcomes in... (More)
- Second-price auctions with public information, such as those on eBay, provide an opportunity for sellers to use the information from finished and ongoing auctions when acting strategically in future auctions. Sellers have frequently been observed to bidding on their own item with the intent to artificially increase its price. This is known as shill bidding. Using lab experiments with two sequential auctions, we study the effect of shill bidding when the seller can choose to shill bid in the second auction. We also study the impact of different information revelation policies regarding the provision of the first auction bidding history to the seller. The experimental data confirm that shill bidding in the second auction affects outcomes in both auctions. Our findings are consistent with the predictions that the threat of shill bidding in the second auction does increase the bidders' final bid in the first auction. However, providing the seller with the bidding history from the first auction does not affect any important outcome variables. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/718ef419-d0d6-4769-9167-bedb4acbf350
- author
- Ingebretsen Carlson, Jim LU and Wu, Tingting
- organization
- publishing date
- 2018
- type
- Working paper/Preprint
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- sequential auctions, shill bidding, experiment, C92, D03, D44
- in
- Working Papers
- issue
- 2018:18
- pages
- 55 pages
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 718ef419-d0d6-4769-9167-bedb4acbf350
- date added to LUP
- 2018-08-01 10:24:14
- date last changed
- 2024-09-10 00:29:42
@misc{718ef419-d0d6-4769-9167-bedb4acbf350, abstract = {{Second-price auctions with public information, such as those on eBay, provide an opportunity for sellers to use the information from finished and ongoing auctions when acting strategically in future auctions. Sellers have frequently been observed to bidding on their own item with the intent to artificially increase its price. This is known as shill bidding. Using lab experiments with two sequential auctions, we study the effect of shill bidding when the seller can choose to shill bid in the second auction. We also study the impact of different information revelation policies regarding the provision of the first auction bidding history to the seller. The experimental data confirm that shill bidding in the second auction affects outcomes in both auctions. Our findings are consistent with the predictions that the threat of shill bidding in the second auction does increase the bidders' final bid in the first auction. However, providing the seller with the bidding history from the first auction does not affect any important outcome variables.}}, author = {{Ingebretsen Carlson, Jim and Wu, Tingting}}, keywords = {{sequential auctions; shill bidding; experiment; C92; D03; D44}}, language = {{eng}}, note = {{Working Paper}}, number = {{2018:18}}, series = {{Working Papers}}, title = {{Shill Bidding and Information in Sequential Auctions: A Laboratory Study}}, url = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/194855190/WP18_18.pdf}}, year = {{2018}}, }