Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

AI-driven FMEA : integration of large language models for faster and more accurate risk analysis

El Hassani, Ibtissam ; Masrour, Tawfik ; Kourouma, Nouhan and Tavčar, Jože LU orcid (2025) In Design Science 11. p.1-28
Abstract
Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a critical but labor-intensive process in product development that aims to identify and mitigate potential failure modes to ensure product quality and reliability. In this paper, a novel framework to improve the FMEA process by integrating generative artificial intelligence (AI), in particular large language models (LLMs), is presented. By using these advanced AI tools, we aim to streamline collaborative work in FMEA, reduce manual effort and improve the accuracy of risk assessments. The proposed framework includes LLMs to support data collection, pre-processing, risk identification, and decision-making in FMEA. This integration enables a more efficient and reliable analysis process and leverages... (More)
Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a critical but labor-intensive process in product development that aims to identify and mitigate potential failure modes to ensure product quality and reliability. In this paper, a novel framework to improve the FMEA process by integrating generative artificial intelligence (AI), in particular large language models (LLMs), is presented. By using these advanced AI tools, we aim to streamline collaborative work in FMEA, reduce manual effort and improve the accuracy of risk assessments. The proposed framework includes LLMs to support data collection, pre-processing, risk identification, and decision-making in FMEA. This integration enables a more efficient and reliable analysis process and leverages the strengths of human expertise and AI capabilities. To validate the framework, we conducted a case study where we first used GPT-3.5 as a proof of concept, followed by a comparison of the performance of three well-known LLMs: GPT-4, GPT-4o and Gemini. These comparisons show significant improvements in terms of speed, accuracy, and reliability of FMEA results compared to traditional methods. Our results emphasize the transformative potential of LLMs in FMEA processes and contribute to more robust design and quality assurance practices. The paper concludes with recommendations for future research focusing on data security and the development of domain-specific LLM training protocols. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
FMEA–failure mode and effects analysis, Generative artificial intelligence, Knowledge management, LLM–large language model, Product quality
in
Design Science
volume
11
article number
e10
pages
28 pages
publisher
Cambridge University Press
external identifiers
  • scopus:105003594334
DOI
10.1017/dsj.2025.7
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
7d24bba3-0b22-47d2-a940-8bec9651b3e2
date added to LUP
2025-04-15 16:23:40
date last changed
2025-05-15 04:01:31
@article{7d24bba3-0b22-47d2-a940-8bec9651b3e2,
  abstract     = {{Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a critical but labor-intensive process in product development that aims to identify and mitigate potential failure modes to ensure product quality and reliability. In this paper, a novel framework to improve the FMEA process by integrating generative artificial intelligence (AI), in particular large language models (LLMs), is presented. By using these advanced AI tools, we aim to streamline collaborative work in FMEA, reduce manual effort and improve the accuracy of risk assessments. The proposed framework includes LLMs to support data collection, pre-processing, risk identification, and decision-making in FMEA. This integration enables a more efficient and reliable analysis process and leverages the strengths of human expertise and AI capabilities. To validate the framework, we conducted a case study where we first used GPT-3.5 as a proof of concept, followed by a comparison of the performance of three well-known LLMs: GPT-4, GPT-4o and Gemini. These comparisons show significant improvements in terms of speed, accuracy, and reliability of FMEA results compared to traditional methods. Our results emphasize the transformative potential of LLMs in FMEA processes and contribute to more robust design and quality assurance practices. The paper concludes with recommendations for future research focusing on data security and the development of domain-specific LLM training protocols.}},
  author       = {{El Hassani, Ibtissam and Masrour, Tawfik and Kourouma, Nouhan and Tavčar, Jože}},
  keywords     = {{FMEA–failure mode and effects analysis; Generative artificial intelligence; Knowledge management; LLM–large language model; Product quality}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{1--28}},
  publisher    = {{Cambridge University Press}},
  series       = {{Design Science}},
  title        = {{AI-driven FMEA : integration of large language models for faster and more accurate risk analysis}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2025.7}},
  doi          = {{10.1017/dsj.2025.7}},
  volume       = {{11}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}