Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

An overview of Clinical Quality Registries (CQRs) on gynecological oncology worldwide

Baldewpersad Tewarie, N. ; van Driel, W. J. ; van Ham, M. A.P.C. ; Wouters, M. W. ; Rome, R. M. ; Høgdall, C. K. ; Pagano, E. ; Hogberg, T. LU ; Kruitwagen, R. and Kruse, A. J. , et al. (2022) In European Journal of Surgical Oncology 48(10). p.2094-2103
Abstract

Introduction: Clinical Quality Registries (CQRs) were initiated in order to compare clinical outcomes between hospitals or regions within a country. To get an overview of these CQRs worldwide the aim of this study was to identify these CQRs for gynecological oncology and to summarize their characteristics, processes and QI's and to establish whether it is feasible to make an international comparison in the future. Methods: To identify CQRs in gynecological oncology a literature search in Pubmed was performed. All papers describing the use of a CQR were included. Administrative, epidemiological and cancer registries were excluded as these registries do not primarily serve to measure quality of care through QI's. The taskforce or contact... (More)

Introduction: Clinical Quality Registries (CQRs) were initiated in order to compare clinical outcomes between hospitals or regions within a country. To get an overview of these CQRs worldwide the aim of this study was to identify these CQRs for gynecological oncology and to summarize their characteristics, processes and QI's and to establish whether it is feasible to make an international comparison in the future. Methods: To identify CQRs in gynecological oncology a literature search in Pubmed was performed. All papers describing the use of a CQR were included. Administrative, epidemiological and cancer registries were excluded as these registries do not primarily serve to measure quality of care through QI's. The taskforce or contact person of the included CQR were asked to participate and share information on registered items, processes and indicators. Results: Five nations agreed to collaborate: Australia, Denmark, Italy, the Netherlands and Sweden. Denmark, Netherlands and Sweden established a nationwide registry, collecting data on multiple tumor types, and various QI's. Australia and Italy included patients with ovarian cancer only. All nations had a different process to report feedback results to participating hospitals. Conclusion: CQRs serve the same purpose to improve quality of care but vary on different aspects. Although similarities are observed in the topics measured by the QI's, an international comparison was not feasible as numerators or denominators differ between registries. In order to compare on an international level it would be useful to harmonize these registries and to set an international standard to measure the quality of care with similar indicators.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; and , et al. (More)
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; and (Less)
author collaboration
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
European Journal of Surgical Oncology
volume
48
issue
10
pages
10 pages
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • pmid:35931589
  • scopus:85135526283
ISSN
0748-7983
DOI
10.1016/j.ejso.2022.06.020
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
9ab8abf1-291a-4c78-8159-be18952fd1fe
date added to LUP
2022-11-29 13:39:26
date last changed
2024-10-14 12:58:59
@article{9ab8abf1-291a-4c78-8159-be18952fd1fe,
  abstract     = {{<p>Introduction: Clinical Quality Registries (CQRs) were initiated in order to compare clinical outcomes between hospitals or regions within a country. To get an overview of these CQRs worldwide the aim of this study was to identify these CQRs for gynecological oncology and to summarize their characteristics, processes and QI's and to establish whether it is feasible to make an international comparison in the future. Methods: To identify CQRs in gynecological oncology a literature search in Pubmed was performed. All papers describing the use of a CQR were included. Administrative, epidemiological and cancer registries were excluded as these registries do not primarily serve to measure quality of care through QI's. The taskforce or contact person of the included CQR were asked to participate and share information on registered items, processes and indicators. Results: Five nations agreed to collaborate: Australia, Denmark, Italy, the Netherlands and Sweden. Denmark, Netherlands and Sweden established a nationwide registry, collecting data on multiple tumor types, and various QI's. Australia and Italy included patients with ovarian cancer only. All nations had a different process to report feedback results to participating hospitals. Conclusion: CQRs serve the same purpose to improve quality of care but vary on different aspects. Although similarities are observed in the topics measured by the QI's, an international comparison was not feasible as numerators or denominators differ between registries. In order to compare on an international level it would be useful to harmonize these registries and to set an international standard to measure the quality of care with similar indicators.</p>}},
  author       = {{Baldewpersad Tewarie, N. and van Driel, W. J. and van Ham, M. A.P.C. and Wouters, M. W. and Rome, R. M. and Høgdall, C. K. and Pagano, E. and Hogberg, T. and Kruitwagen, R. and Kruse, A. J. and Yigit, R. and van der Aa, M. and Mens, J. W. and Stam, T. C. and Diepstraten, J. and van der Kolk, A. and Engelen, M.}},
  issn         = {{0748-7983}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{10}},
  pages        = {{2094--2103}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  series       = {{European Journal of Surgical Oncology}},
  title        = {{An overview of Clinical Quality Registries (CQRs) on gynecological oncology worldwide}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2022.06.020}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.ejso.2022.06.020}},
  volume       = {{48}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}