Examination technique, image quality, and patient dose in paediatric radiology. A survey including 19 Swedish hospitals
(1996) In Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987) 37(3 Pt 1). p.42-337- Abstract
- PURPOSE: Investigation of examination technique, image quality, and absorbed dose to the patients in paediatric radiology. - MATERIAL AND METHODS: In total, 19 Swedish hospitals participated in the study. Using a questionnaire, the hospitals described their examination technique for the pelvis, urinary tract, colon, scoliosis, and lung. The image quality and patient dose were experimentally studied for the simulated pelvis examination of a 1-year-old child. This examination was carried out with a test object containing a contrast-detail phantom. TL dosimeters were used to determine the absorbed dose on the surface of the phantom, approximately corresponding to the absorbed dose on the surface of the patient. - RESULTS:... (More) 
- PURPOSE: Investigation of examination technique, image quality, and absorbed dose to the patients in paediatric radiology. - MATERIAL AND METHODS: In total, 19 Swedish hospitals participated in the study. Using a questionnaire, the hospitals described their examination technique for the pelvis, urinary tract, colon, scoliosis, and lung. The image quality and patient dose were experimentally studied for the simulated pelvis examination of a 1-year-old child. This examination was carried out with a test object containing a contrast-detail phantom. TL dosimeters were used to determine the absorbed dose on the surface of the phantom, approximately corresponding to the absorbed dose on the surface of the patient. - RESULTS: Examination techniques varied considerably among the hospitals, the most striking difference concerning the film-screen sensitivity. Consequently, there was a variation in the absorbed dose on the surface of the phantom, from 0.09 mGy to 1.7 mGy (mean 0.65 mGy). For a large range of doses, 0.4-1.7 mGy, the image quality was not significantly different. - CONCLUSION: The unharmonized, and in many places unoptimized, examination techniques led to a great variation in the absorbed dose to the children examined. (Less)
- author
- Almén, A LU ; Lööf, M and Mattsson, S LU
- publishing date
- 1996-05
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Child, Data Collection, Humans, Infant, Phantoms, Imaging, Radiation Dosage, Radiation Protection, Radiography/methods, Radiometry, Sweden, X-Ray Intensifying Screens
- in
- Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987)
- volume
- 37
- issue
- 3 Pt 1
- pages
- 6 pages
- publisher
- SAGE Publications
- external identifiers
- 
                - pmid:8845265
- scopus:0030139394
 
- ISSN
- 0284-1851
- DOI
- 10.1177/02841851960371P171
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- no
- id
- d01371c3-21c7-4afe-96ca-43488aea0bc9
- date added to LUP
- 2018-06-16 21:12:13
- date last changed
- 2025-10-29 12:23:12
@article{d01371c3-21c7-4afe-96ca-43488aea0bc9,
  abstract     = {{<p>PURPOSE: Investigation of examination technique, image quality, and absorbed dose to the patients in paediatric radiology.</p><p>MATERIAL AND METHODS: In total, 19 Swedish hospitals participated in the study. Using a questionnaire, the hospitals described their examination technique for the pelvis, urinary tract, colon, scoliosis, and lung. The image quality and patient dose were experimentally studied for the simulated pelvis examination of a 1-year-old child. This examination was carried out with a test object containing a contrast-detail phantom. TL dosimeters were used to determine the absorbed dose on the surface of the phantom, approximately corresponding to the absorbed dose on the surface of the patient.</p><p>RESULTS: Examination techniques varied considerably among the hospitals, the most striking difference concerning the film-screen sensitivity. Consequently, there was a variation in the absorbed dose on the surface of the phantom, from 0.09 mGy to 1.7 mGy (mean 0.65 mGy). For a large range of doses, 0.4-1.7 mGy, the image quality was not significantly different.</p><p>CONCLUSION: The unharmonized, and in many places unoptimized, examination techniques led to a great variation in the absorbed dose to the children examined.</p>}},
  author       = {{Almén, A and Lööf, M and Mattsson, S}},
  issn         = {{0284-1851}},
  keywords     = {{Child; Data Collection; Humans; Infant; Phantoms, Imaging; Radiation Dosage; Radiation Protection; Radiography/methods; Radiometry; Sweden; X-Ray Intensifying Screens}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{3 Pt 1}},
  pages        = {{42--337}},
  publisher    = {{SAGE Publications}},
  series       = {{Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987)}},
  title        = {{Examination technique, image quality, and patient dose in paediatric radiology. A survey including 19 Swedish hospitals}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02841851960371P171}},
  doi          = {{10.1177/02841851960371P171}},
  volume       = {{37}},
  year         = {{1996}},
}