Information literacy challenges in digital culture : Conflicting engagements of trust and doubt
Haider, Jutta LU and Sundin, Olof LU
(2022)
In Information, Communication & Society
25(8).
p.1176-1191
- Abstract
- The ability of citizens to establish the credibility of information andinformation sources through critical assessment is oftenemphasized as essential for the upholding of a democraticsociety and for people’s health and safety. Drawing on material-discursive conceptualizations, the article asks, how does criticalassessment of information and information sources play out as itis folded into a networked information infrastructure in whichdifferent types of information are mediated and shaped by thesame algorithms andflattened into the same interfaces? Theempirical material comprises dyadic interviews with 61adolescents. The interviews were analysed using an interpretativeapproach focusing on the construction of action and... (More)
- The ability of citizens to establish the credibility of information andinformation sources through critical assessment is oftenemphasized as essential for the upholding of a democraticsociety and for people’s health and safety. Drawing on material-discursive conceptualizations, the article asks, how does criticalassessment of information and information sources play out as itis folded into a networked information infrastructure in whichdifferent types of information are mediated and shaped by thesame algorithms andflattened into the same interfaces? Theempirical material comprises dyadic interviews with 61adolescents. The interviews were analysed using an interpretativeapproach focusing on the construction of action and meaning.The analysis foregrounds trust and agency as two dimensions.This way normative assumptions become visible as stereotypes,sometimes positioned as ideals towards which to strive, othertimes as deterrent examples: the non-evaluator, the naïveevaluator, the skeptical evaluator and the confident evaluator.The created stereotypes help to comprehend differentunderstandings of critical assessment of information and howthese can bring about different actions. The article argues thatcritical assessment of information as an element in media andinformation literacy must be understood not just in relation tohow it is used to assess the credibility of information, but alsoregarding how it is performatively enrolled in the shaping ofknowledge and in the creation of ignorance and doubt. (Less)
- Abstract (Swedish)
- The ability of citizens to establish the credibility of information and information sources through critical assessment is often emphasized as essential for the upholding of a democratic society and for people’s health and safety. Drawing on material-discursive conceptualizations, the article asks, how does critical assessment of information and information sources play out as it is folded into a networked information infrastructure in which different types of information are mediated and shaped by the same algorithms and flattened into the same interfaces? The empirical material comprises dyadic interviews with 61 adolescents. The interviews were analysed using an interpretative approach focusing on the construction of action and meaning.... (More)
- The ability of citizens to establish the credibility of information and information sources through critical assessment is often emphasized as essential for the upholding of a democratic society and for people’s health and safety. Drawing on material-discursive conceptualizations, the article asks, how does critical assessment of information and information sources play out as it is folded into a networked information infrastructure in which different types of information are mediated and shaped by the same algorithms and flattened into the same interfaces? The empirical material comprises dyadic interviews with 61 adolescents. The interviews were analysed using an interpretative approach focusing on the construction of action and meaning. The analysis foregrounds trust and agency as two dimensions. This way normative assumptions become visible as stereotypes, sometimes positioned as ideals towards which to strive, other times as deterrent examples: the non-evaluator, the naïve evaluator, the skeptical evaluator and the confident evaluator. The created stereotypes help to comprehend different understandings of critical assessment of information and how these can bring about different actions. The article argues that critical assessment of information as an element in media and information literacy must be understood not just in relation to how it is used to assess the credibility of information, but also regarding how it is performatively enrolled in the shaping of knowledge and in the creation of ignorance and doubt. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/e6cb115a-11d1-442c-a58d-1ad1a6a007d4
- author
- Haider, Jutta
LU
and Sundin, Olof
LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2022
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- information literacy, algorithms, trust, sociomaterality
- in
- Information, Communication & Society
- volume
- 25
- issue
- 8
- pages
- 1176 - 1191
- publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85097145258
- ISSN
- 1369-118X
- DOI
- 10.1080/1369118X.2020.1851389
- project
- Algorithms and Literacies: Young people's understanding and society's expectations
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- e6cb115a-11d1-442c-a58d-1ad1a6a007d4
- date added to LUP
- 2020-12-05 09:08:33
- date last changed
- 2022-12-08 20:28:14
@article{e6cb115a-11d1-442c-a58d-1ad1a6a007d4,
abstract = {{The ability of citizens to establish the credibility of information andinformation sources through critical assessment is oftenemphasized as essential for the upholding of a democraticsociety and for people’s health and safety. Drawing on material-discursive conceptualizations, the article asks, how does criticalassessment of information and information sources play out as itis folded into a networked information infrastructure in whichdifferent types of information are mediated and shaped by thesame algorithms andflattened into the same interfaces? Theempirical material comprises dyadic interviews with 61adolescents. The interviews were analysed using an interpretativeapproach focusing on the construction of action and meaning.The analysis foregrounds trust and agency as two dimensions.This way normative assumptions become visible as stereotypes,sometimes positioned as ideals towards which to strive, othertimes as deterrent examples: the non-evaluator, the naïveevaluator, the skeptical evaluator and the confident evaluator.The created stereotypes help to comprehend differentunderstandings of critical assessment of information and howthese can bring about different actions. The article argues thatcritical assessment of information as an element in media andinformation literacy must be understood not just in relation tohow it is used to assess the credibility of information, but alsoregarding how it is performatively enrolled in the shaping ofknowledge and in the creation of ignorance and doubt.}},
author = {{Haider, Jutta and Sundin, Olof}},
issn = {{1369-118X}},
keywords = {{information literacy; algorithms; trust; sociomaterality}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{8}},
pages = {{1176--1191}},
publisher = {{Taylor & Francis}},
series = {{Information, Communication & Society}},
title = {{Information literacy challenges in digital culture : Conflicting engagements of trust and doubt}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1851389}},
doi = {{10.1080/1369118X.2020.1851389}},
volume = {{25}},
year = {{2022}},
}