Automaticity in the recognition of nonverbal emotional vocalizations
Lima, César F. ; Anikin, Andrey LU
; Monteiro, Ana Catarina
; Scott, Sophie K.
and Castro, Sao Luis
(2019)
In Emotion
19(2).
p.219-233
- Abstract
- The ability to perceive the emotions of others is crucial for everyday social interactions. Important aspects of visual socioemotional processing, such as the recognition of facial expressions, are known to depend on largely automatic mechanisms. However, whether and how properties of automaticity extend to the auditory domain remains poorly understood. Here we ask if nonverbal auditory emotion recognition is a controlled deliberate or an automatic efficient process, using vocalizations such as laughter, crying, and screams. In a between-subjects design (N = 112), and covering eight emotions (four positive), we determined whether emotion recognition accuracy (a) is improved when participants actively deliberate about their responses... (More)
- The ability to perceive the emotions of others is crucial for everyday social interactions. Important aspects of visual socioemotional processing, such as the recognition of facial expressions, are known to depend on largely automatic mechanisms. However, whether and how properties of automaticity extend to the auditory domain remains poorly understood. Here we ask if nonverbal auditory emotion recognition is a controlled deliberate or an automatic efficient process, using vocalizations such as laughter, crying, and screams. In a between-subjects design (N = 112), and covering eight emotions (four positive), we determined whether emotion recognition accuracy (a) is improved when participants actively deliberate about their responses (compared with when they respond as fast as possible) and (b) is impaired when they respond under low and high levels of cognitive load (concurrent task involving memorizing sequences of six or eight digits, respectively). Response latencies were also measured. Mixed-effects models revealed that recognition accuracy was high across emotions, and only minimally affected by deliberation and cognitive load; the benefits of deliberation and costs of cognitive load were significant mostly for positive emotions, notably amusement/laughter, and smaller or absent for negative ones; response latencies did not suffer under low or high cognitive load; and high recognition accuracy (approximately 90%) could be reached within 500 ms after the stimulus onset, with performance exceeding chance-level already between 300 and 360 ms. These findings indicate that key features of automaticity, namely fast and efficient/effortless processing, might be a modality-independent component of emotion recognition. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/e7230f44-b562-4e6f-acfd-2fed16cdcfe1
- author
- Lima, César F.
; Anikin, Andrey
LU
; Monteiro, Ana Catarina
; Scott, Sophie K.
and Castro, Sao Luis
- organization
- publishing date
- 2019
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- automaticity, cognitive load, deliberation, emotion recognition, nonverbal vocalizations
- in
- Emotion
- volume
- 19
- issue
- 2
- pages
- 219 - 233
- publisher
- American Psychological Association (APA)
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85047340629
- pmid:29792444
- ISSN
- 1528-3542
- DOI
- 10.1037/emo0000429
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- e7230f44-b562-4e6f-acfd-2fed16cdcfe1
- date added to LUP
- 2018-06-18 10:37:06
- date last changed
- 2022-04-25 07:35:59
@article{e7230f44-b562-4e6f-acfd-2fed16cdcfe1,
abstract = {{The ability to perceive the emotions of others is crucial for everyday social interactions. Important aspects of visual socioemotional processing, such as the recognition of facial expressions, are known to depend on largely automatic mechanisms. However, whether and how properties of automaticity extend to the auditory domain remains poorly understood. Here we ask if nonverbal auditory emotion recognition is a controlled deliberate or an automatic efficient process, using vocalizations such as laughter, crying, and screams. In a between-subjects design (N = 112), and covering eight emotions (four positive), we determined whether emotion recognition accuracy (a) is improved when participants actively deliberate about their responses (compared with when they respond as fast as possible) and (b) is impaired when they respond under low and high levels of cognitive load (concurrent task involving memorizing sequences of six or eight digits, respectively). Response latencies were also measured. Mixed-effects models revealed that recognition accuracy was high across emotions, and only minimally affected by deliberation and cognitive load; the benefits of deliberation and costs of cognitive load were significant mostly for positive emotions, notably amusement/laughter, and smaller or absent for negative ones; response latencies did not suffer under low or high cognitive load; and high recognition accuracy (approximately 90%) could be reached within 500 ms after the stimulus onset, with performance exceeding chance-level already between 300 and 360 ms. These findings indicate that key features of automaticity, namely fast and efficient/effortless processing, might be a modality-independent component of emotion recognition.}},
author = {{Lima, César F. and Anikin, Andrey and Monteiro, Ana Catarina and Scott, Sophie K. and Castro, Sao Luis}},
issn = {{1528-3542}},
keywords = {{automaticity; cognitive load; deliberation; emotion recognition; nonverbal vocalizations}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{2}},
pages = {{219--233}},
publisher = {{American Psychological Association (APA)}},
series = {{Emotion}},
title = {{Automaticity in the recognition of nonverbal emotional vocalizations}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/emo0000429}},
doi = {{10.1037/emo0000429}},
volume = {{19}},
year = {{2019}},
}