Career and family : Does outsourcing household work matter?
(2024) Nordic Sociological Association- Abstract
- Despite the traditionally generous family policies in Scandinavian welfare states, few new
initiatives have been introduced to alleviate the pressures of paid and unpaid work over the past
decades. This 'double burden' of paid and unpaid work, particularly impacting women, can
impact economic, demographic, and social outcomes. It becomes heavier as societies are
faced by an ageing population. Moreover, socioeconomic groups may be affected differently.
The RUT and ROT reforms can be seen as an indirect family policy as they may help to relieve the
double burden. These reforms allow tax deductions for outsourced household and maintenance
work. Since their implementation – in 2007 and 2009 respectively – they... (More) - Despite the traditionally generous family policies in Scandinavian welfare states, few new
initiatives have been introduced to alleviate the pressures of paid and unpaid work over the past
decades. This 'double burden' of paid and unpaid work, particularly impacting women, can
impact economic, demographic, and social outcomes. It becomes heavier as societies are
faced by an ageing population. Moreover, socioeconomic groups may be affected differently.
The RUT and ROT reforms can be seen as an indirect family policy as they may help to relieve the
double burden. These reforms allow tax deductions for outsourced household and maintenance
work. Since their implementation – in 2007 and 2009 respectively – they have grown steadily in
terms of the number of individuals using the deductions and the cost they incur to the state. Yet,
there is little research on their impacts. One study identifies an effect of RUT on women’s labor
market outcomes. Beyond paid work, we have limited insights into the role of these reforms in
relieving the burden of unpaid work and its division across household members and
socioeconomic groups.
The purpose of this paper is to describe the characteristics of ROT and RUT users and their
outcomes in terms of paid and unpaid work. We examine the distribution of ROT/RUT usage
across different socioeconomic and gender groups 2007-2022. We then describe how ROT/RUT
usage is gendered differently by socioeconomic status, and compare the outcomes of users and
non-users. Our analysis is based on individual-level longitudinal register-based covering all
Swedes. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/07167a88-a215-4cc9-b187-041f872b76fb
- author
- Dalman, Elien
LU
; Nilsson, Therese LU ; Eklund, Lisa LU and Elwert, Annika LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2024-08-15
- type
- Contribution to conference
- publication status
- unpublished
- subject
- conference name
- Nordic Sociological Association
- conference location
- Norrköping
- conference dates
- 2024-08-14 - 2024-08-16
- project
- Changing gender and class relations in the wake of RUT and ROT usage
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 07167a88-a215-4cc9-b187-041f872b76fb
- date added to LUP
- 2025-02-25 11:14:45
- date last changed
- 2025-04-04 14:58:59
@misc{07167a88-a215-4cc9-b187-041f872b76fb, abstract = {{Despite the traditionally generous family policies in Scandinavian welfare states, few new <br/>initiatives have been introduced to alleviate the pressures of paid and unpaid work over the past <br/>decades. This 'double burden' of paid and unpaid work, particularly impacting women, can <br/>impact economic, demographic, and social outcomes. It becomes heavier as societies are <br/>faced by an ageing population. Moreover, socioeconomic groups may be affected differently.<br/>The RUT and ROT reforms can be seen as an indirect family policy as they may help to relieve the <br/>double burden. These reforms allow tax deductions for outsourced household and maintenance <br/>work. Since their implementation – in 2007 and 2009 respectively – they have grown steadily in <br/>terms of the number of individuals using the deductions and the cost they incur to the state. Yet, <br/>there is little research on their impacts. One study identifies an effect of RUT on women’s labor <br/>market outcomes. Beyond paid work, we have limited insights into the role of these reforms in <br/>relieving the burden of unpaid work and its division across household members and <br/>socioeconomic groups.<br/>The purpose of this paper is to describe the characteristics of ROT and RUT users and their <br/>outcomes in terms of paid and unpaid work. We examine the distribution of ROT/RUT usage <br/>across different socioeconomic and gender groups 2007-2022. We then describe how ROT/RUT <br/>usage is gendered differently by socioeconomic status, and compare the outcomes of users and <br/>non-users. Our analysis is based on individual-level longitudinal register-based covering all <br/>Swedes.}}, author = {{Dalman, Elien and Nilsson, Therese and Eklund, Lisa and Elwert, Annika}}, language = {{eng}}, month = {{08}}, title = {{Career and family : Does outsourcing household work matter?}}, year = {{2024}}, }