A randomized trial of basing treatment on human papillomavirus and/or cytology results in low-grade cervical lesion triage
(2008) In American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 199(1). p.1-24- Abstract
- OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to compare management algorithms that base treatment with loop electrosurgical excision procedure on human papillomavirus and/or repeat Papanicolaou test smear results. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized trial that referred 674 women with either atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions cytology results, detected in organized screening to treatment either (1) if they were positive in a repeat Papanicolaou test smear and/or a human papillomavirus test or (2) if they were positive in the repeat Papanicolaou test smear test only. Women who tested positive were treated, regardless of colposcopic findings. RESULTS: There were 208 of 337 (62%) women who were... (More)
- OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to compare management algorithms that base treatment with loop electrosurgical excision procedure on human papillomavirus and/or repeat Papanicolaou test smear results. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized trial that referred 674 women with either atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions cytology results, detected in organized screening to treatment either (1) if they were positive in a repeat Papanicolaou test smear and/or a human papillomavirus test or (2) if they were positive in the repeat Papanicolaou test smear test only. Women who tested positive were treated, regardless of colposcopic findings. RESULTS: There were 208 of 337 (62%) women who were treated in the human papillomavirus /Papanicolaou test smear group (187/337 because of HPV positivity) and 138 of 337 (41%) in the Papanicolaou test smear only group. Histopathologically diagnosed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse was found among 112 of 337 (33.2%) women in the human papillomavirus/Papanicolaou test smear group compared with 85 of 337 (25.2%) women in the Papanicolaou test smear only group (P < .05). Twenty-one women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2+ had normal colposcopy. CONCLUSION: For adequate cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2+ sensitivity, the decision to use loop electrosurgical excision procedure needs to be based on human papillomavirus testing results and should not exclude women with normal colposcopy. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1187195
- author
- Bjerre, Pontus LU ; Silfverdal, Lena ; Dillner, Lena LU ; Hagmar, Bjorn ; Edvardsson, Henrik ; Dillner, Joakim LU and Andersson-Ellstrom, Agneta
- organization
- publishing date
- 2008
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- procedure, loop electrosurgical excision, colposcopy, intraepithelial neoplasia, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, cervical, randomized trial
- in
- American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- volume
- 199
- issue
- 1
- pages
- 1 - 24
- publisher
- Elsevier
- external identifiers
-
- wos:000257205200006
- scopus:45649084756
- ISSN
- 1097-6868
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.11.053
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 9662bc8a-6c98-4beb-9d38-6e3b886c90b3 (old id 1187195)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 11:56:57
- date last changed
- 2022-04-13 03:41:33
@article{9662bc8a-6c98-4beb-9d38-6e3b886c90b3, abstract = {{OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to compare management algorithms that base treatment with loop electrosurgical excision procedure on human papillomavirus and/or repeat Papanicolaou test smear results. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized trial that referred 674 women with either atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions cytology results, detected in organized screening to treatment either (1) if they were positive in a repeat Papanicolaou test smear and/or a human papillomavirus test or (2) if they were positive in the repeat Papanicolaou test smear test only. Women who tested positive were treated, regardless of colposcopic findings. RESULTS: There were 208 of 337 (62%) women who were treated in the human papillomavirus /Papanicolaou test smear group (187/337 because of HPV positivity) and 138 of 337 (41%) in the Papanicolaou test smear only group. Histopathologically diagnosed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse was found among 112 of 337 (33.2%) women in the human papillomavirus/Papanicolaou test smear group compared with 85 of 337 (25.2%) women in the Papanicolaou test smear only group (P < .05). Twenty-one women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2+ had normal colposcopy. CONCLUSION: For adequate cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2+ sensitivity, the decision to use loop electrosurgical excision procedure needs to be based on human papillomavirus testing results and should not exclude women with normal colposcopy.}}, author = {{Bjerre, Pontus and Silfverdal, Lena and Dillner, Lena and Hagmar, Bjorn and Edvardsson, Henrik and Dillner, Joakim and Andersson-Ellstrom, Agneta}}, issn = {{1097-6868}}, keywords = {{procedure; loop electrosurgical excision; colposcopy; intraepithelial neoplasia; atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance; cervical; randomized trial}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{1--24}}, publisher = {{Elsevier}}, series = {{American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology}}, title = {{A randomized trial of basing treatment on human papillomavirus and/or cytology results in low-grade cervical lesion triage}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.11.053}}, doi = {{10.1016/j.ajog.2007.11.053}}, volume = {{199}}, year = {{2008}}, }