Advanced

Hand injuries and cold sensitivity: Reliability and validity of cold sensitivity questionnaires.

Carlsson, Ingela LU ; Cederlund, Ragnhild LU ; Höglund, Peter LU ; Lundborg, Göran LU and Rosén, Birgitta LU (2008) In Disability and Rehabilitation 30(25). p.1920-1928
Abstract
Purpose. Sensitivity to cold is a common consequence of hand injuries and other conditions, and this phenomenon has a profound effect on health-related quality of life and upper-extremity disability. The aim of the present study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Swedish version of the Cold Sensitivity Severity (CSS) scale and Cold Intolerance Symptom Severity (CISS) questionnaire and the reliability of the Potential Work Exposure Scale in a group of patients with traumatic hand-injury or vibration-induced problems. Method. We translated the self-administered questionnaires into Swedish and performed tests of reliability and validity. The questionnaire was sent to 159 patients with hand injuries. Results. Validity and... (More)
Purpose. Sensitivity to cold is a common consequence of hand injuries and other conditions, and this phenomenon has a profound effect on health-related quality of life and upper-extremity disability. The aim of the present study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Swedish version of the Cold Sensitivity Severity (CSS) scale and Cold Intolerance Symptom Severity (CISS) questionnaire and the reliability of the Potential Work Exposure Scale in a group of patients with traumatic hand-injury or vibration-induced problems. Method. We translated the self-administered questionnaires into Swedish and performed tests of reliability and validity. The questionnaire was sent to 159 patients with hand injuries. Results. Validity and internal-consistency results are based on a sample of 122. Test - retest results are based on a sample of 100. Good construct validity was demonstrated via correlation statistics. There were high correlations for both the CSS scale and CISS questionnaire scores with single questions concerning cold sensitivity, with the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scale, and with the bodily-pain subscale of the SF-36 questionnaire. Reliability (both internal consistency and test - retest) was excellent. Conclusions. We conclude that the Swedish versions of the CSS scale and CISS questionnaire are reliable, and that this study provides evidence of the validity of the scales. The Potential Work Exposure Scale is reliable method of assessing exposure in the workplace. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Disability and Rehabilitation
volume
30
issue
25
pages
1920 - 1928
publisher
Taylor & Francis
external identifiers
  • wos:000261673700004
  • pmid:19061118
  • scopus:57549084602
ISSN
0963-8288
DOI
10.1080/09638280701679705
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
1a92f9dc-46d5-4527-a6e0-ea32b1eeacae (old id 1276371)
alternative location
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19061118?dopt=Abstract
date added to LUP
2009-01-09 11:44:08
date last changed
2017-03-26 04:26:05
@article{1a92f9dc-46d5-4527-a6e0-ea32b1eeacae,
  abstract     = {Purpose. Sensitivity to cold is a common consequence of hand injuries and other conditions, and this phenomenon has a profound effect on health-related quality of life and upper-extremity disability. The aim of the present study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Swedish version of the Cold Sensitivity Severity (CSS) scale and Cold Intolerance Symptom Severity (CISS) questionnaire and the reliability of the Potential Work Exposure Scale in a group of patients with traumatic hand-injury or vibration-induced problems. Method. We translated the self-administered questionnaires into Swedish and performed tests of reliability and validity. The questionnaire was sent to 159 patients with hand injuries. Results. Validity and internal-consistency results are based on a sample of 122. Test - retest results are based on a sample of 100. Good construct validity was demonstrated via correlation statistics. There were high correlations for both the CSS scale and CISS questionnaire scores with single questions concerning cold sensitivity, with the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scale, and with the bodily-pain subscale of the SF-36 questionnaire. Reliability (both internal consistency and test - retest) was excellent. Conclusions. We conclude that the Swedish versions of the CSS scale and CISS questionnaire are reliable, and that this study provides evidence of the validity of the scales. The Potential Work Exposure Scale is reliable method of assessing exposure in the workplace.},
  author       = {Carlsson, Ingela and Cederlund, Ragnhild and Höglund, Peter and Lundborg, Göran and Rosén, Birgitta},
  issn         = {0963-8288},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {25},
  pages        = {1920--1928},
  publisher    = {Taylor & Francis},
  series       = {Disability and Rehabilitation},
  title        = {Hand injuries and cold sensitivity: Reliability and validity of cold sensitivity questionnaires.},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638280701679705},
  volume       = {30},
  year         = {2008},
}