Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Quantifying soil carbon sequestration from regenerative agricultural practices in crops and vineyards

Villat, Jessica and Nicholas, Kimberly A. LU orcid (2023) In Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 7.
Abstract

Introduction: Regenerative agriculture commonly aims to increase soil carbon sequestration, with potential benefits for human and ecosystem health, climate mitigation, and biodiversity. However, the effectiveness of various regenerative practices at increasing carbon sequestration is unclear. Methods: This study identified and quantified the yearly soil carbon sequestration rate of regenerative practices in arable cropland and vineyard ecosystems through a literature review. We examined N=345 soil carbon sequestration measures across seven regenerative practices – agroforestry, cover cropping, legume cover cropping, animal integration, non-chemical fertilizer, non-chemical pest management, and no tillage. Results: Our findings indicate... (More)

Introduction: Regenerative agriculture commonly aims to increase soil carbon sequestration, with potential benefits for human and ecosystem health, climate mitigation, and biodiversity. However, the effectiveness of various regenerative practices at increasing carbon sequestration is unclear. Methods: This study identified and quantified the yearly soil carbon sequestration rate of regenerative practices in arable cropland and vineyard ecosystems through a literature review. We examined N=345 soil carbon sequestration measures across seven regenerative practices – agroforestry, cover cropping, legume cover cropping, animal integration, non-chemical fertilizer, non-chemical pest management, and no tillage. Results: Our findings indicate that all seven practices effectively increased the carbon sequestration rate. There were no statistically significant differences among the practices. Combining these practices may further enhance soil carbon sequestration. Discussion: We propose a sequence of regenerative practices that farmers can adopt, balancing ease of implementation and carbon sequestration effectiveness. To address under-studied practices, we recommend further research, including long-term monitoring studies and randomized controlled trials in perennial systems. Our recommendations aim to enhance the implementation and effectiveness of regenerative practices while mitigating the current challenge of limited sample sizes for quantifying carbon sequestration.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
agroforestry, cover crop, farm practices, living soil, regenerative agriculture, regenerative viticulture, soil organic carbon
in
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
volume
7
article number
1234108
publisher
Frontiers Media S. A.
external identifiers
  • scopus:85184897124
ISSN
2571-581X
DOI
10.3389/fsufs.2023.1234108
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
180060e4-2700-40eb-a57a-df6a6dd4c3c9
date added to LUP
2024-02-27 10:38:15
date last changed
2024-02-27 10:39:58
@article{180060e4-2700-40eb-a57a-df6a6dd4c3c9,
  abstract     = {{<p>Introduction: Regenerative agriculture commonly aims to increase soil carbon sequestration, with potential benefits for human and ecosystem health, climate mitigation, and biodiversity. However, the effectiveness of various regenerative practices at increasing carbon sequestration is unclear. Methods: This study identified and quantified the yearly soil carbon sequestration rate of regenerative practices in arable cropland and vineyard ecosystems through a literature review. We examined N=345 soil carbon sequestration measures across seven regenerative practices – agroforestry, cover cropping, legume cover cropping, animal integration, non-chemical fertilizer, non-chemical pest management, and no tillage. Results: Our findings indicate that all seven practices effectively increased the carbon sequestration rate. There were no statistically significant differences among the practices. Combining these practices may further enhance soil carbon sequestration. Discussion: We propose a sequence of regenerative practices that farmers can adopt, balancing ease of implementation and carbon sequestration effectiveness. To address under-studied practices, we recommend further research, including long-term monitoring studies and randomized controlled trials in perennial systems. Our recommendations aim to enhance the implementation and effectiveness of regenerative practices while mitigating the current challenge of limited sample sizes for quantifying carbon sequestration.</p>}},
  author       = {{Villat, Jessica and Nicholas, Kimberly A.}},
  issn         = {{2571-581X}},
  keywords     = {{agroforestry; cover crop; farm practices; living soil; regenerative agriculture; regenerative viticulture; soil organic carbon}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  publisher    = {{Frontiers Media S. A.}},
  series       = {{Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems}},
  title        = {{Quantifying soil carbon sequestration from regenerative agricultural practices in crops and vineyards}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1234108}},
  doi          = {{10.3389/fsufs.2023.1234108}},
  volume       = {{7}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}