Comparative study of the student's design process: Implications for the teaching of the later phases of the mechanical engineering design process
(2004) 1st CDEN Design Conference- Abstract
- Most methods that guide the designer through the later phases of the design process are general in nature, and it is up to the designer to organize the design work using the tools and techniques available. This process also relies greatly on experience, which is quite a challenge for students, who are mostly novices in the area. In a comparative study, the evolution of the experience and skills acquired by the students in performing design tasks during the embodiment design and detail design phases has been analyzed. The results indicate the main directions for improvement in teaching the later phases of the mechanical engineering design process.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/578298
- author
- Motte, Damien LU ; Andersson, Per-Erik LU and Bjärnemo, Robert LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2004
- type
- Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- design process, detail design, engineering design, embodiment design, mechanical engineering design process, SoTL, machine design, maskinkonstruktion
- categories
- Higher Education
- host publication
- Proceedings of the 1st CDEN Design Conference
- editor
- Angeles, Jorge and Stuart, Paul
- pages
- 10 pages
- publisher
- Canadian Design Engineering Network (CDEN)
- conference name
- 1st CDEN Design Conference
- conference dates
- 2004-07-29 - 2004-07-30
- DOI
- 10.24908/pceea.v0i0.4045
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 21fcfae6-ebae-47b9-b0e7-b432815c8d3d (old id 578298)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-04 10:07:20
- date last changed
- 2023-03-27 11:21:01
@inproceedings{21fcfae6-ebae-47b9-b0e7-b432815c8d3d, abstract = {{Most methods that guide the designer through the later phases of the design process are general in nature, and it is up to the designer to organize the design work using the tools and techniques available. This process also relies greatly on experience, which is quite a challenge for students, who are mostly novices in the area. In a comparative study, the evolution of the experience and skills acquired by the students in performing design tasks during the embodiment design and detail design phases has been analyzed. The results indicate the main directions for improvement in teaching the later phases of the mechanical engineering design process.}}, author = {{Motte, Damien and Andersson, Per-Erik and Bjärnemo, Robert}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 1st CDEN Design Conference}}, editor = {{Angeles, Jorge and Stuart, Paul}}, keywords = {{design process; detail design; engineering design; embodiment design; mechanical engineering design process; SoTL; machine design; maskinkonstruktion}}, language = {{eng}}, publisher = {{Canadian Design Engineering Network (CDEN)}}, title = {{Comparative study of the student's design process: Implications for the teaching of the later phases of the mechanical engineering design process}}, url = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/5466356/578328.pdf}}, doi = {{10.24908/pceea.v0i0.4045}}, year = {{2004}}, }