Advanced

Balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty in the management of vertebral compression fractures

Boonen, S.; Wahl, D. A.; Nauroy, L.; Brandi, M. L.; Bouxsein, M. L.; Goldhahn, J.; Lewiecki, E. M.; Lyritis, G. P.; Marsh, D. and Obrant, Karl LU , et al. (2011) In Osteoporosis International 22(12). p.2915-2934
Abstract
Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are the most prevalent fractures in osteoporotic patients. The classical conservative management of these fractures is through rest, pain medication, bracing and muscle relaxants. The aim of this paper is to review prospective controlled studies comparing the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive techniques for vertebral augmentation, vertebroplasty (VP) and balloon kyphoplasty (BKP), versus non-surgical management (NSM). The Fracture Working Group of the International Osteoporosis Foundation conducted a literature search and developed a review paper on VP and BKP. The results presented for the direct management of osteoporotic VCFs focused on clinical outcomes of these three different procedures,... (More)
Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are the most prevalent fractures in osteoporotic patients. The classical conservative management of these fractures is through rest, pain medication, bracing and muscle relaxants. The aim of this paper is to review prospective controlled studies comparing the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive techniques for vertebral augmentation, vertebroplasty (VP) and balloon kyphoplasty (BKP), versus non-surgical management (NSM). The Fracture Working Group of the International Osteoporosis Foundation conducted a literature search and developed a review paper on VP and BKP. The results presented for the direct management of osteoporotic VCFs focused on clinical outcomes of these three different procedures, including reduction in pain, improvement of function and mobility, vertebral height restoration and decrease in spinal curvature (kyphosis). Overall, VP and BKP are generally safe procedures that provide quicker pain relief, mobility recovery and in some cases vertebral height restoration than conventional conservative medical treatment, at least in the short term. However, the long-term benefits and safety in terms of risk of subsequent vertebral fractures have not been clearly demonstrated and further prospective randomized studies are needed with standards for reporting. Referral physicians should be aware of VP/BKP and their potential to reduce the health impairment of patients with VCFs. However, VP and BKP are not substitutes for appropriate evaluation and treatment of osteoporosis to reduce the risk of future fractures. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
, et al. (More)
(Less)
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
IOF, Kyphoplasty, Osteoporosis, Pain management, Vertebral fractures, Vertebroplasty
in
Osteoporosis International
volume
22
issue
12
pages
2915 - 2934
publisher
Springer
external identifiers
  • wos:000297151200001
  • scopus:84155172879
ISSN
1433-2965
DOI
10.1007/s00198-011-1639-5
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
f9111421-a3c7-4040-a10d-57a0521d10a7 (old id 2252582)
date added to LUP
2012-01-02 07:56:44
date last changed
2017-08-06 03:54:40
@article{f9111421-a3c7-4040-a10d-57a0521d10a7,
  abstract     = {Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are the most prevalent fractures in osteoporotic patients. The classical conservative management of these fractures is through rest, pain medication, bracing and muscle relaxants. The aim of this paper is to review prospective controlled studies comparing the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive techniques for vertebral augmentation, vertebroplasty (VP) and balloon kyphoplasty (BKP), versus non-surgical management (NSM). The Fracture Working Group of the International Osteoporosis Foundation conducted a literature search and developed a review paper on VP and BKP. The results presented for the direct management of osteoporotic VCFs focused on clinical outcomes of these three different procedures, including reduction in pain, improvement of function and mobility, vertebral height restoration and decrease in spinal curvature (kyphosis). Overall, VP and BKP are generally safe procedures that provide quicker pain relief, mobility recovery and in some cases vertebral height restoration than conventional conservative medical treatment, at least in the short term. However, the long-term benefits and safety in terms of risk of subsequent vertebral fractures have not been clearly demonstrated and further prospective randomized studies are needed with standards for reporting. Referral physicians should be aware of VP/BKP and their potential to reduce the health impairment of patients with VCFs. However, VP and BKP are not substitutes for appropriate evaluation and treatment of osteoporosis to reduce the risk of future fractures.},
  author       = {Boonen, S. and Wahl, D. A. and Nauroy, L. and Brandi, M. L. and Bouxsein, M. L. and Goldhahn, J. and Lewiecki, E. M. and Lyritis, G. P. and Marsh, D. and Obrant, Karl and Silverman, S. and Siris, E. and Åkesson, Kristina},
  issn         = {1433-2965},
  keyword      = {IOF,Kyphoplasty,Osteoporosis,Pain management,Vertebral fractures,Vertebroplasty},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {12},
  pages        = {2915--2934},
  publisher    = {Springer},
  series       = {Osteoporosis International},
  title        = {Balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty in the management of vertebral compression fractures},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1639-5},
  volume       = {22},
  year         = {2011},
}