Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

How Do Teachers With Self-Reported Voice Problems Differ From Their Peers With Self-Reported Voice Health?

Lyberg Åhlander, Viveka LU ; Rydell, Roland LU and Löfqvist, Anders LU (2012) In Journal of Voice 26(4). p.149-161
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This randomized case-control study compares teachers with self-reported voice problems to age-, gender-, and school-matched colleagues with self-reported voice health. The self-assessed voice function is related to factors known to influence the voice: laryngeal findings, voice quality, personality, psychosocial and coping aspects, searching for causative factors of voice problems in teachers. METHODS: Subjects and controls, recruited from a teacher group in an earlier questionnaire study, underwent examinations of the larynx by high-speed imaging and kymograms; voice recordings; voice range profile; audiometry; self-assessment of voice handicap and voice function; teaching and environmental aspects; personality; coping;... (More)
OBJECTIVES: This randomized case-control study compares teachers with self-reported voice problems to age-, gender-, and school-matched colleagues with self-reported voice health. The self-assessed voice function is related to factors known to influence the voice: laryngeal findings, voice quality, personality, psychosocial and coping aspects, searching for causative factors of voice problems in teachers. METHODS: Subjects and controls, recruited from a teacher group in an earlier questionnaire study, underwent examinations of the larynx by high-speed imaging and kymograms; voice recordings; voice range profile; audiometry; self-assessment of voice handicap and voice function; teaching and environmental aspects; personality; coping; burnout, and work-related issues. The laryngeal and voice recordings were assessed by experienced phoniatricians and speech pathologists. RESULTS: The subjects with self-assessed voice problems differed from their peers with self-assessed voice health by significantly longer recovery time from voice problems and scored higher on all subscales of the Voice Handicap Index-Throat. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the cause of voice dysfunction in this group of teachers with self-reported voice problems is not found in the vocal apparatus or within the individual. The individual's perception of a voice problem seems to be based on a combination of the number of symptoms and of how often the symptoms occur, along with the recovery time. The results also underline the importance of using self-assessed reports of voice dysfunction. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Journal of Voice
volume
26
issue
4
pages
149 - 161
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • wos:000305961500003
  • pmid:21889297
  • scopus:84863186316
  • pmid:21889297
ISSN
0892-1997
DOI
10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.06.005
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
241bdc86-301b-4903-9f32-1b1e948e45cc (old id 2169155)
alternative location
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21889297?dopt=Abstract
date added to LUP
2016-04-01 13:24:16
date last changed
2022-04-07 09:37:14
@article{241bdc86-301b-4903-9f32-1b1e948e45cc,
  abstract     = {{OBJECTIVES: This randomized case-control study compares teachers with self-reported voice problems to age-, gender-, and school-matched colleagues with self-reported voice health. The self-assessed voice function is related to factors known to influence the voice: laryngeal findings, voice quality, personality, psychosocial and coping aspects, searching for causative factors of voice problems in teachers. METHODS: Subjects and controls, recruited from a teacher group in an earlier questionnaire study, underwent examinations of the larynx by high-speed imaging and kymograms; voice recordings; voice range profile; audiometry; self-assessment of voice handicap and voice function; teaching and environmental aspects; personality; coping; burnout, and work-related issues. The laryngeal and voice recordings were assessed by experienced phoniatricians and speech pathologists. RESULTS: The subjects with self-assessed voice problems differed from their peers with self-assessed voice health by significantly longer recovery time from voice problems and scored higher on all subscales of the Voice Handicap Index-Throat. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the cause of voice dysfunction in this group of teachers with self-reported voice problems is not found in the vocal apparatus or within the individual. The individual's perception of a voice problem seems to be based on a combination of the number of symptoms and of how often the symptoms occur, along with the recovery time. The results also underline the importance of using self-assessed reports of voice dysfunction.}},
  author       = {{Lyberg Åhlander, Viveka and Rydell, Roland and Löfqvist, Anders}},
  issn         = {{0892-1997}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{149--161}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  series       = {{Journal of Voice}},
  title        = {{How Do Teachers With Self-Reported Voice Problems Differ From Their Peers With Self-Reported Voice Health?}},
  url          = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/3347730/2831694.pdf}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.06.005}},
  volume       = {{26}},
  year         = {{2012}},
}