What is discerned in teachers’ expressions about planning? : Similarities and differences between teachers from Sweden and Hong Kong
Holmqvist, Mona LU
and Wennås Brante, Eva
(2011)
In Education Inquiry
2(3).
p.497-514
- Abstract
The aim of this study is to find out what teachers say their primary focus is when planning to teach an object of learning. The study is carried out in two different cultural contexts, Sweden and Hong Kong, and based on the framework of variation theory, which has a two-fold focus, namely both what teachers do and what students learn at school. Fifteen semi-structured open-ended interviews were conducted with nine Swedish and six Hong Kong teachers in grades 1 to 6. The analysis generated categories inspired from a phenomenographic research approach, where attention is directed towards respondents’ apprehensions of a phenomenon. The results showed some clear differences in the way teachers from the two countries talked about how they... (More)
The aim of this study is to find out what teachers say their primary focus is when planning to teach an object of learning. The study is carried out in two different cultural contexts, Sweden and Hong Kong, and based on the framework of variation theory, which has a two-fold focus, namely both what teachers do and what students learn at school. Fifteen semi-structured open-ended interviews were conducted with nine Swedish and six Hong Kong teachers in grades 1 to 6. The analysis generated categories inspired from a phenomenographic research approach, where attention is directed towards respondents’ apprehensions of a phenomenon. The results showed some clear differences in the way teachers from the two countries talked about how they organise and think about planning, which in turn reveals whether their focus is on students’ understanding or on teacher action. The Swedish teachers’ experienced focus is on activities/methods, and they separate activities and methods from the content, while the Hong Kong teachers have the content in the foreground and do not separate content and act. There can be several different explanations of the differences identified; such as that a too general theoretical and surface awareness of concepts of learning makes it difficult to reach a detailed level of the object of learning, i.e. what it actually takes for students to learn exactly this phenomenon or ability. The Swedish teachers seem to underestimate what it takes to learn due to a theoretical framework. Another explanation of this difference in focus might be that teachers need support from each other to deepen the reflections about the subject, thus achieving knowledge of what it takes to understand the intended object of learning. The Hong Kong teachers report frequent opportunities to discuss and reflect over subject-related matters.
(Less)
- author
- Holmqvist, Mona
LU
and Wennås Brante, Eva
- publishing date
- 2011-09-01
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- content, discern, phenomenography, planning, variation theory
- in
- Education Inquiry
- volume
- 2
- issue
- 3
- pages
- 18 pages
- publisher
- Umeå Universitet, School of Education
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85007123602
- ISSN
- 2000-4508
- DOI
- 10.3402/edui.v2i3.21996
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- no
- additional info
- Publisher Copyright: © 2011, © 2011 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis.
- id
- 2adc73b6-deef-42e2-afea-161b9f601a7c
- date added to LUP
- 2023-09-05 14:09:57
- date last changed
- 2023-09-14 10:36:41
@article{2adc73b6-deef-42e2-afea-161b9f601a7c,
abstract = {{<p>The aim of this study is to find out what teachers say their primary focus is when planning to teach an object of learning. The study is carried out in two different cultural contexts, Sweden and Hong Kong, and based on the framework of variation theory, which has a two-fold focus, namely both what teachers do and what students learn at school. Fifteen semi-structured open-ended interviews were conducted with nine Swedish and six Hong Kong teachers in grades 1 to 6. The analysis generated categories inspired from a phenomenographic research approach, where attention is directed towards respondents’ apprehensions of a phenomenon. The results showed some clear differences in the way teachers from the two countries talked about how they organise and think about planning, which in turn reveals whether their focus is on students’ understanding or on teacher action. The Swedish teachers’ experienced focus is on activities/methods, and they separate activities and methods from the content, while the Hong Kong teachers have the content in the foreground and do not separate content and act. There can be several different explanations of the differences identified; such as that a too general theoretical and surface awareness of concepts of learning makes it difficult to reach a detailed level of the object of learning, i.e. what it actually takes for students to learn exactly this phenomenon or ability. The Swedish teachers seem to underestimate what it takes to learn due to a theoretical framework. Another explanation of this difference in focus might be that teachers need support from each other to deepen the reflections about the subject, thus achieving knowledge of what it takes to understand the intended object of learning. The Hong Kong teachers report frequent opportunities to discuss and reflect over subject-related matters.</p>}},
author = {{Holmqvist, Mona and Wennås Brante, Eva}},
issn = {{2000-4508}},
keywords = {{content; discern; phenomenography; planning; variation theory}},
language = {{eng}},
month = {{09}},
number = {{3}},
pages = {{497--514}},
publisher = {{Umeå Universitet, School of Education}},
series = {{Education Inquiry}},
title = {{What is discerned in teachers’ expressions about planning? : Similarities and differences between teachers from Sweden and Hong Kong}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/edui.v2i3.21996}},
doi = {{10.3402/edui.v2i3.21996}},
volume = {{2}},
year = {{2011}},
}