Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

“Our burgers eat carbon”: Investigating the discourses of corporate net-zero commitments

Lund Christiansen, Kirstine LU ; Hajdu, Flora ; Planting Mollaoglu, Emil ; Andrews, Alice ; Carton, Wim LU orcid and Fischer, Klara (2023) In Environmental Science and Policy 142. p.79-88
Abstract
Corporate net-zero emission pledges have multiplied in recent years, with estimates suggesting that more than 1000 companies have made such commitments. While seemingly indicative of companies stepping up to address climate change, critics have argued that pledges may be mere greenwashing if they rely on excessive offsetting and legitimise business-as-usual. Considerable grey and academic literature has debated the problems of net-zero and explored the integrity and transparency of net-zero plans. We add to this literature by investigating discursive aspects of net-zero logics through an in-depth case study of the Swedish fast food chain MAX Burgers AB. Through a textual analysis of MAX’s communication of its ‘climate-positive’ – or... (More)
Corporate net-zero emission pledges have multiplied in recent years, with estimates suggesting that more than 1000 companies have made such commitments. While seemingly indicative of companies stepping up to address climate change, critics have argued that pledges may be mere greenwashing if they rely on excessive offsetting and legitimise business-as-usual. Considerable grey and academic literature has debated the problems of net-zero and explored the integrity and transparency of net-zero plans. We add to this literature by investigating discursive aspects of net-zero logics through an in-depth case study of the Swedish fast food chain MAX Burgers AB. Through a textual analysis of MAX’s communication of its ‘climate-positive’ – or net-negative – burgers, we explore the narratives underpinning its net-zero work and how these serve MAX’s interests. Our investigation shows that MAX’s net-zero claim justifies its existing business practices and directs focus away from actions that could directly reduce its emissions. Thus, we show that MAX is pushing non-transformative solutions, such as offsetting and voluntary corporate action, while shifting responsibility for climate action onto others, such as consumers and smallholder farmers in the global South. We conclude that even seemingly progressive corporate net-zero pledges and claims become problematic if they distract from real reductions and justify carbon-intensive lifestyles. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Environmental Science and Policy
volume
142
pages
79 - 88
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • scopus:85148054229
ISSN
1462-9011
DOI
10.1016/j.envsci.2023.01.015
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
3069bc2a-2e91-4faa-9564-447b0e79a5b0
date added to LUP
2023-02-14 08:23:04
date last changed
2023-03-03 13:04:23
@article{3069bc2a-2e91-4faa-9564-447b0e79a5b0,
  abstract     = {{Corporate net-zero emission pledges have multiplied in recent years, with estimates suggesting that more than 1000 companies have made such commitments. While seemingly indicative of companies stepping up to address climate change, critics have argued that pledges may be mere greenwashing if they rely on excessive offsetting and legitimise business-as-usual. Considerable grey and academic literature has debated the problems of net-zero and explored the integrity and transparency of net-zero plans. We add to this literature by investigating discursive aspects of net-zero logics through an in-depth case study of the Swedish fast food chain MAX Burgers AB. Through a textual analysis of MAX’s communication of its ‘climate-positive’ – or net-negative – burgers, we explore the narratives underpinning its net-zero work and how these serve MAX’s interests. Our investigation shows that MAX’s net-zero claim justifies its existing business practices and directs focus away from actions that could directly reduce its emissions. Thus, we show that MAX is pushing non-transformative solutions, such as offsetting and voluntary corporate action, while shifting responsibility for climate action onto others, such as consumers and smallholder farmers in the global South. We conclude that even seemingly progressive corporate net-zero pledges and claims become problematic if they distract from real reductions and justify carbon-intensive lifestyles.}},
  author       = {{Lund Christiansen, Kirstine and Hajdu, Flora and Planting Mollaoglu, Emil and Andrews, Alice and Carton, Wim and Fischer, Klara}},
  issn         = {{1462-9011}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{79--88}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  series       = {{Environmental Science and Policy}},
  title        = {{“Our burgers eat carbon”: Investigating the discourses of corporate net-zero commitments}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.01.015}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.envsci.2023.01.015}},
  volume       = {{142}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}