Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

The influence of spasticity on goniometric range of motion measurement in children with cerebral palsy

Lindén, Olof LU ; Lauruschkus, Katarina LU ; Wagner, Philippe LU ; Hägglund, Gunnar LU and Lauge-Pedersen, Henrik LU (2026) In BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 27(1).
Abstract

Introduction: Spasticity may introduce bias in passive range of motion (ROM) measurements in children with cerebral palsy. This study aimed to explore the impact of spasticity on the reliability and potential measurement bias of goniometric assessments of ankle dorsiflexion and knee extension in children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy (USCP). Methods: Thirty-two children aged 6–17 years with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy were included. Two blinded investigators measured ROM on the spastic and contralateral sides using a two-axis goniometer, and spasticity was graded with the Modified Ashworth Scale. The primary outcome was the between-side difference in inter-examiner measurement bias, analysed using paired t-tests and... (More)

Introduction: Spasticity may introduce bias in passive range of motion (ROM) measurements in children with cerebral palsy. This study aimed to explore the impact of spasticity on the reliability and potential measurement bias of goniometric assessments of ankle dorsiflexion and knee extension in children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy (USCP). Methods: Thirty-two children aged 6–17 years with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy were included. Two blinded investigators measured ROM on the spastic and contralateral sides using a two-axis goniometer, and spasticity was graded with the Modified Ashworth Scale. The primary outcome was the between-side difference in inter-examiner measurement bias, analysed using paired t-tests and confidence intervals. Secondary outcomes—agreement and reliability—were assessed using Bland–Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results: No clinically meaningful differences in ROM measurement bias were found between the spastic and contralateral sides for ankle dorsiflexion (extended knee: mean difference − 0.22°, 95% CI: − 2.53 to 2.09; flexed knee: 0.78°, 95% CI: − 3.57 to 2.01), knee extension (0.31°, 95% CI: − 1.63 to 1.01), or hamstrings angle (0.50°, 95% CI: − 2.53 to 3.53). ICC indicated high inter-rater reliability. Conclusions: These findings support the use of goniometry as a reliable tool for assessing joint mobility in clinical and research settings. Results were reliable for measurements on a spastic and contralateral limb and no clinically significant bias was found.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Bias, Cerebral palsy, Children, Goniometer, Range of Motion, Reliability, Spasticity
in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
volume
27
issue
1
article number
289
publisher
BioMed Central (BMC)
external identifiers
  • scopus:105035185131
  • pmid:41781917
ISSN
1471-2474
DOI
10.1186/s12891-026-09659-3
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
354fb36c-5c9c-492b-bda1-a701e21f54f7
date added to LUP
2026-06-10 08:59:00
date last changed
2026-06-11 03:00:11
@article{354fb36c-5c9c-492b-bda1-a701e21f54f7,
  abstract     = {{<p>Introduction: Spasticity may introduce bias in passive range of motion (ROM) measurements in children with cerebral palsy. This study aimed to explore the impact of spasticity on the reliability and potential measurement bias of goniometric assessments of ankle dorsiflexion and knee extension in children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy (USCP). Methods: Thirty-two children aged 6–17 years with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy were included. Two blinded investigators measured ROM on the spastic and contralateral sides using a two-axis goniometer, and spasticity was graded with the Modified Ashworth Scale. The primary outcome was the between-side difference in inter-examiner measurement bias, analysed using paired t-tests and confidence intervals. Secondary outcomes—agreement and reliability—were assessed using Bland–Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results: No clinically meaningful differences in ROM measurement bias were found between the spastic and contralateral sides for ankle dorsiflexion (extended knee: mean difference − 0.22°, 95% CI: − 2.53 to 2.09; flexed knee: 0.78°, 95% CI: − 3.57 to 2.01), knee extension (0.31°, 95% CI: − 1.63 to 1.01), or hamstrings angle (0.50°, 95% CI: − 2.53 to 3.53). ICC indicated high inter-rater reliability. Conclusions: These findings support the use of goniometry as a reliable tool for assessing joint mobility in clinical and research settings. Results were reliable for measurements on a spastic and contralateral limb and no clinically significant bias was found.</p>}},
  author       = {{Lindén, Olof and Lauruschkus, Katarina and Wagner, Philippe and Hägglund, Gunnar and Lauge-Pedersen, Henrik}},
  issn         = {{1471-2474}},
  keywords     = {{Bias; Cerebral palsy; Children; Goniometer; Range of Motion; Reliability; Spasticity}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  publisher    = {{BioMed Central (BMC)}},
  series       = {{BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders}},
  title        = {{The influence of spasticity on goniometric range of motion measurement in children with cerebral palsy}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-026-09659-3}},
  doi          = {{10.1186/s12891-026-09659-3}},
  volume       = {{27}},
  year         = {{2026}},
}