Advanced

Un interval poetic

Nicolau, Felix LU (2018) In Steaua 10(840). p.34-35
Abstract
There are directions of interpretation with which some researchers may disagree. But it would be difficult for someone to point to rigidities, idiosyncracies or dangerous arguments. In fact, the demonstrations of Ion Pop meet the conditions for verifying the degree of science stated by an epistemologist such as Karl Popper. Any hypothesis has to be checked but also contradicted. Any theoretical ensemble should not be imagined perfectly and undeniably. The modest demand in this book of literary history is that
neo-modernism should no longer be dispatched simplistically, on the grounds that it would conclude, anachronistically, a poetic paradigm exhausted in the interwar period. Without questioning the importance of postmodernists, Ion... (More)
There are directions of interpretation with which some researchers may disagree. But it would be difficult for someone to point to rigidities, idiosyncracies or dangerous arguments. In fact, the demonstrations of Ion Pop meet the conditions for verifying the degree of science stated by an epistemologist such as Karl Popper. Any hypothesis has to be checked but also contradicted. Any theoretical ensemble should not be imagined perfectly and undeniably. The modest demand in this book of literary history is that
neo-modernism should no longer be dispatched simplistically, on the grounds that it would conclude, anachronistically, a poetic paradigm exhausted in the interwar period. Without questioning the importance of postmodernists, Ion Pop studies under the microscope the proximity of modernism, neo-modernism, and subsequently which he confirms or builds new bridges to further developments. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
alternative title
A poetic interval
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
neomodernist literature, postmodernism, epistemology and literature, Romanian Literature, Languages and Literature studies (specific languages)
in
Steaua
volume
10
issue
840
article number
11
pages
2 pages
ISSN
0039-0852
language
Romanian
LU publication?
yes
id
3586c26a-7c38-49eb-ab2f-1df803f5759e
date added to LUP
2019-05-31 22:14:40
date last changed
2019-07-01 12:18:33
@misc{3586c26a-7c38-49eb-ab2f-1df803f5759e,
  abstract     = {There are directions of interpretation with which some researchers may disagree. But it would be difficult for someone to point to rigidities, idiosyncracies or dangerous arguments. In fact, the demonstrations of Ion Pop meet the conditions for verifying the degree of science stated by an epistemologist such as Karl Popper. Any hypothesis has to be checked but also contradicted. Any theoretical ensemble should not be imagined perfectly and undeniably. The modest demand in this book of literary history is that<br/>neo-modernism should no longer be dispatched simplistically, on the grounds that it would conclude, anachronistically, a poetic paradigm exhausted in the interwar period. Without questioning the importance of postmodernists, Ion Pop studies under the microscope the proximity of modernism, neo-modernism, and subsequently which he confirms or builds new bridges to further developments.},
  author       = {Nicolau, Felix},
  issn         = {0039-0852},
  language     = {rum},
  month        = {10},
  note         = {Review},
  number       = {840},
  pages        = {34--35},
  series       = {Steaua},
  title        = {Un interval poetic},
  url          = {https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/ws/files/65285876/Steaua_nr_10_din_2018_1_.pdf},
  volume       = {10},
  year         = {2018},
}