Assessing habitat quality of farm-dwelling house sparrows in different agricultural landscapes.
Post, Maria von LU ; Borgström, Pernilla LU ; Smith, Henrik LU and Olsson, Ola LU
(2012)
In Oecologia
168(4).
p.959-966
- Abstract
- Having historically been abundant throughout Europe, the house sparrow (Passer domesticus) has in recent decades suffered severe population declines in many urban and rural areas. The decline in rural environments is believed to be caused by agricultural intensification, which has resulted in landscape simplification. We used giving-up densities (GUDs) of house sparrows feeding in artificial food patches placed in farmlands of southern Sweden to determine habitat quality during the breeding season at two different spatial scales: the landscape and the patch scale. At the landscape scale, GUDs were lower on farms in homogeneous landscapes dominated by crop production compared to more heterogeneous landscapes with mixed farming or animal... (More)
- Having historically been abundant throughout Europe, the house sparrow (Passer domesticus) has in recent decades suffered severe population declines in many urban and rural areas. The decline in rural environments is believed to be caused by agricultural intensification, which has resulted in landscape simplification. We used giving-up densities (GUDs) of house sparrows feeding in artificial food patches placed in farmlands of southern Sweden to determine habitat quality during the breeding season at two different spatial scales: the landscape and the patch scale. At the landscape scale, GUDs were lower on farms in homogeneous landscapes dominated by crop production compared to more heterogeneous landscapes with mixed farming or animal husbandry. At the patch level, feeding patches with a higher predation risk (caused by fitting a wall to the patch to obstruct vigilance) had higher GUDs. In addition, GUDs were positively related to population size, which strongly implies that GUDs reflect habitat quality. However, the increase followed different patterns in homogeneous and heterogeneous landscapes, indicating differing population limiting mechanisms in these two environments. We found no effect of the interaction between patch type and landscape type, suggesting that predation risk was similar in both landscape types. Thus, our study suggests that simplified landscapes constitute a poorer feeding environment for house sparrows during breeding, that the population-regulating mechanisms in the landscapes differ, but that predation risk is the same across the landscape types. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/2221399
- author
- Post, Maria von
LU
; Borgström, Pernilla
LU
; Smith, Henrik
LU
and Olsson, Ola
LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2012
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Giving-up density, Foraging, Conservation, GUD, Predation
- in
- Oecologia
- volume
- 168
- issue
- 4
- pages
- 959 - 966
- publisher
- Springer
- external identifiers
-
- wos:000301604200007
- pmid:22037991
- scopus:84858008434
- ISSN
- 1432-1939
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00442-011-2169-8
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 3c2e1d9c-c58a-4ef9-a145-92d6322095db (old id 2221399)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 11:06:00
- date last changed
- 2024-04-08 01:11:46
@article{3c2e1d9c-c58a-4ef9-a145-92d6322095db,
abstract = {{Having historically been abundant throughout Europe, the house sparrow (Passer domesticus) has in recent decades suffered severe population declines in many urban and rural areas. The decline in rural environments is believed to be caused by agricultural intensification, which has resulted in landscape simplification. We used giving-up densities (GUDs) of house sparrows feeding in artificial food patches placed in farmlands of southern Sweden to determine habitat quality during the breeding season at two different spatial scales: the landscape and the patch scale. At the landscape scale, GUDs were lower on farms in homogeneous landscapes dominated by crop production compared to more heterogeneous landscapes with mixed farming or animal husbandry. At the patch level, feeding patches with a higher predation risk (caused by fitting a wall to the patch to obstruct vigilance) had higher GUDs. In addition, GUDs were positively related to population size, which strongly implies that GUDs reflect habitat quality. However, the increase followed different patterns in homogeneous and heterogeneous landscapes, indicating differing population limiting mechanisms in these two environments. We found no effect of the interaction between patch type and landscape type, suggesting that predation risk was similar in both landscape types. Thus, our study suggests that simplified landscapes constitute a poorer feeding environment for house sparrows during breeding, that the population-regulating mechanisms in the landscapes differ, but that predation risk is the same across the landscape types.}},
author = {{Post, Maria von and Borgström, Pernilla and Smith, Henrik and Olsson, Ola}},
issn = {{1432-1939}},
keywords = {{Giving-up density; Foraging; Conservation; GUD; Predation}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{4}},
pages = {{959--966}},
publisher = {{Springer}},
series = {{Oecologia}},
title = {{Assessing habitat quality of farm-dwelling house sparrows in different agricultural landscapes.}},
url = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/2379295/2534993.pdf}},
doi = {{10.1007/s00442-011-2169-8}},
volume = {{168}},
year = {{2012}},
}