"Do you see Yonder cloud?" - On priming concepts, a new test, and a familiar outcome. Reply to Lucas et al. : "Familiarity or conceptual priming? Good question! Comment on Stenberg, Hellman, Johansson, and Rosén (2009)"
(2010) In Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22(4). p.618-620- Abstract
Lucas, Voss, and Paller sympathize with our intentions but disagree with our findings. They argue that a relation between frequency and conceptual priming may have been obscured by methodological details in our second experiment, therefore failing to complete a bridge between conceptual priming and FN400 with name frequency as the mediator. However, renewed inspections of our experiment and a new additional experiment, designed to meet the objections, fail to find any role for name frequency in conceptual priming and therefore re-establish the dissociation of priming and the FN400. On closer inspection, our differing views seem to derive from different interpretations of the term "concept."
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/4390b0bf-9791-4c4c-a433-2f1ec07dd991
- author
- Stenberg, Georg LU ; Johansson, Mikael LU ; Hellman, Johan LU and Rosén, Ingmar LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2010-04
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- volume
- 22
- issue
- 4
- pages
- 618 - 620
- publisher
- MIT Press
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:77649215627
- pmid:19422290
- ISSN
- 0898-929X
- DOI
- 10.1162/jocn.2009.21268
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 4390b0bf-9791-4c4c-a433-2f1ec07dd991
- date added to LUP
- 2022-03-08 09:13:17
- date last changed
- 2024-01-03 09:16:58
@misc{4390b0bf-9791-4c4c-a433-2f1ec07dd991, abstract = {{<p>Lucas, Voss, and Paller sympathize with our intentions but disagree with our findings. They argue that a relation between frequency and conceptual priming may have been obscured by methodological details in our second experiment, therefore failing to complete a bridge between conceptual priming and FN400 with name frequency as the mediator. However, renewed inspections of our experiment and a new additional experiment, designed to meet the objections, fail to find any role for name frequency in conceptual priming and therefore re-establish the dissociation of priming and the FN400. On closer inspection, our differing views seem to derive from different interpretations of the term "concept."</p>}}, author = {{Stenberg, Georg and Johansson, Mikael and Hellman, Johan and Rosén, Ingmar}}, issn = {{0898-929X}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{4}}, pages = {{618--620}}, publisher = {{MIT Press}}, series = {{Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience}}, title = {{"Do you see Yonder cloud?" - On priming concepts, a new test, and a familiar outcome. Reply to Lucas et al. : "Familiarity or conceptual priming? Good question! Comment on Stenberg, Hellman, Johansson, and Rosén (2009)"}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21268}}, doi = {{10.1162/jocn.2009.21268}}, volume = {{22}}, year = {{2010}}, }