Molecular Subtypes as a Basis for Stratified Use of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer—A Narrative Review
(2022) In Cancers 14(7). p.1-17- Abstract
There are no established biomarkers to guide patient selection for neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Recent studies suggest that molecular subtype classification holds promise for predicting chemotherapy response and/or survival benefit in this setting. Here, we summarize and discuss the scientific literature examining transcriptomic or panel-based molecular subtyping applied to neoadjuvant chemotherapy-treated patient cohorts. We find that there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the basal subtype of muscle-invasive bladder cancer responds well to chemotherapy, since only a minority of studies support this conclusion. More evidence indicates that luminal-like subtypes may... (More)
There are no established biomarkers to guide patient selection for neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Recent studies suggest that molecular subtype classification holds promise for predicting chemotherapy response and/or survival benefit in this setting. Here, we summarize and discuss the scientific literature examining transcriptomic or panel-based molecular subtyping applied to neoadjuvant chemotherapy-treated patient cohorts. We find that there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the basal subtype of muscle-invasive bladder cancer responds well to chemotherapy, since only a minority of studies support this conclusion. More evidence indicates that luminal-like subtypes may have the most improved outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. There are also conflicting data concerning the association between biopsy stromal content and response. Subtypes indicative of high stromal infiltration responded well in some studies and poorly in others. Uncertainties when interpreting the current literature include a lack of reporting both response and survival outcomes and the inherent risk of bias in retrospective study designs. Taken together, available studies suggest a role for molecular subtyping in stratifying patients for receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The precise classification system that best captures such a predictive effect, and the exact subtypes for which other treatment options are more beneficial remains to be established, preferably in prospective studies.
(Less)
- author
- Sjödahl, Gottfrid LU ; Abrahamsson, Johan LU ; Bernardo, Carina LU ; Eriksson, Pontus LU ; Höglund, Mattias LU and Liedberg, Fredrik LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2022
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- basal, biomarker, bladder cancer, chemotherapy, cisplatin, luminal, molecular subtypes, neoadjuvant, response, urothelial carcinoma
- in
- Cancers
- volume
- 14
- issue
- 7
- article number
- 1692
- pages
- 1 - 17
- publisher
- MDPI AG
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:35406463
- scopus:85127049703
- ISSN
- 2072-6694
- DOI
- 10.3390/cancers14071692
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- additional info
- Publisher Copyright: © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
- id
- 4dbd5657-e510-4502-8485-bbcce6fc8b91
- date added to LUP
- 2022-04-19 21:57:11
- date last changed
- 2025-01-14 04:27:22
@article{4dbd5657-e510-4502-8485-bbcce6fc8b91, abstract = {{<p>There are no established biomarkers to guide patient selection for neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Recent studies suggest that molecular subtype classification holds promise for predicting chemotherapy response and/or survival benefit in this setting. Here, we summarize and discuss the scientific literature examining transcriptomic or panel-based molecular subtyping applied to neoadjuvant chemotherapy-treated patient cohorts. We find that there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the basal subtype of muscle-invasive bladder cancer responds well to chemotherapy, since only a minority of studies support this conclusion. More evidence indicates that luminal-like subtypes may have the most improved outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. There are also conflicting data concerning the association between biopsy stromal content and response. Subtypes indicative of high stromal infiltration responded well in some studies and poorly in others. Uncertainties when interpreting the current literature include a lack of reporting both response and survival outcomes and the inherent risk of bias in retrospective study designs. Taken together, available studies suggest a role for molecular subtyping in stratifying patients for receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The precise classification system that best captures such a predictive effect, and the exact subtypes for which other treatment options are more beneficial remains to be established, preferably in prospective studies.</p>}}, author = {{Sjödahl, Gottfrid and Abrahamsson, Johan and Bernardo, Carina and Eriksson, Pontus and Höglund, Mattias and Liedberg, Fredrik}}, issn = {{2072-6694}}, keywords = {{basal; biomarker; bladder cancer; chemotherapy; cisplatin; luminal; molecular subtypes; neoadjuvant; response; urothelial carcinoma}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{7}}, pages = {{1--17}}, publisher = {{MDPI AG}}, series = {{Cancers}}, title = {{Molecular Subtypes as a Basis for Stratified Use of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer—A Narrative Review}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14071692}}, doi = {{10.3390/cancers14071692}}, volume = {{14}}, year = {{2022}}, }