Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Towards a sustainable decision analysis approach for moisture-safe building envelope design

Bayat Pour, Mohsen LU and Abdul Hamid, Akram LU orcid (2024) In Journal of Building Engineering 97.
Abstract
Energy-efficient building designs, notably through adding insulation, can reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions by over 40 %, but may also increase risk of condensation. Therefore, a comprehensive decision analysis approach is essential for selecting optimal building envelope assemblies while considering their hygrothermal, economic, and environmental implications. This study introduces a novel decision analysis method based on the inutility decision analysis (IDA) concept, in which the building envelope with the lowest inutility is considered the optimal choice. Initially, different building envelope assemblies were assessed through probabilistic hygrothermal analysis combined with a machine learning metamodel.... (More)
Energy-efficient building designs, notably through adding insulation, can reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions by over 40 %, but may also increase risk of condensation. Therefore, a comprehensive decision analysis approach is essential for selecting optimal building envelope assemblies while considering their hygrothermal, economic, and environmental implications. This study introduces a novel decision analysis method based on the inutility decision analysis (IDA) concept, in which the building envelope with the lowest inutility is considered the optimal choice. Initially, different building envelope assemblies were assessed through probabilistic hygrothermal analysis combined with a machine learning metamodel. Subsequently, the environmental and economic consequences associated with each assembly were quantified by integrating moisture-related damage into these assessments. Combining these outputs yielded inutility indices for the case studies, guiding the selection of the most optimal alternative. The results indicated that an external wall, with a minor risk of moisture-related failure, may outperform other alternatives when considering economic and environmental metrics. However, the final decision on the acceptability of such risk should rest with the customers or owners. Balancing the trade-off between performance longevity, cost, and occupants’ health is crucial. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Building envelope, Decision analysis, Moisture safety design, Environmental and economic impact, Probabilistic analysis
in
Journal of Building Engineering
volume
97
pages
21 pages
publisher
Elsevier
ISSN
2352-7102
DOI
10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110955
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
50f0c74b-bed0-4261-bace-a7b8cbf52803
date added to LUP
2024-10-04 07:37:00
date last changed
2024-10-15 12:39:21
@article{50f0c74b-bed0-4261-bace-a7b8cbf52803,
  abstract     = {{Energy-efficient building designs, notably through adding insulation, can reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions by over 40 %, but may also increase risk of condensation. Therefore, a comprehensive decision analysis approach is essential for selecting optimal building envelope assemblies while considering their hygrothermal, economic, and environmental implications. This study introduces a novel decision analysis method based on the inutility decision analysis (IDA) concept, in which the building envelope with the lowest inutility is considered the optimal choice. Initially, different building envelope assemblies were assessed through probabilistic hygrothermal analysis combined with a machine learning metamodel. Subsequently, the environmental and economic consequences associated with each assembly were quantified by integrating moisture-related damage into these assessments. Combining these outputs yielded inutility indices for the case studies, guiding the selection of the most optimal alternative. The results indicated that an external wall, with a minor risk of moisture-related failure, may outperform other alternatives when considering economic and environmental metrics. However, the final decision on the acceptability of such risk should rest with the customers or owners. Balancing the trade-off between performance longevity, cost, and occupants’ health is crucial.}},
  author       = {{Bayat Pour, Mohsen and Abdul Hamid, Akram}},
  issn         = {{2352-7102}},
  keywords     = {{Building envelope; Decision analysis; Moisture safety design; Environmental and economic impact; Probabilistic analysis}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{11}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  series       = {{Journal of Building Engineering}},
  title        = {{Towards a sustainable decision analysis approach for moisture-safe building envelope design}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110955}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110955}},
  volume       = {{97}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}