Head-to-head comparison between Actigraph 7164 and GT1M accelerometers in adolescents.
Tanha, Tina LU ; Tornberg, Åsa LU
; Wollmer, Per
LU
and Dencker, Magnus
LU
(2013)
In Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging
33(2).
p.162-165
- Abstract
- We compared, head-to-head, the old generation Actigraph model 7164 with the new generation Actigraph GT1M accelerometer. A total of 15 randomly selected teenagers (eight girls and seven boys) were investigated. They performed a treadmill test wearing the two kinds of accelerometers around the waist simultaneously. The treadmill test consisted of three different levels of speed 4, 6 and 8 km h(-1) for four consecutive minutes. Accelerometer counts per 1 sec epoch for the Actigraph GT1M versus the Actigraph 7164 were at 4 km h(-1) 21·6 ± 12·9 versus 26·5 ± 11·5 counts, at 6 km h(-1) 56·0 ± 23·2 versus 62·9 ± 25·6 counts and at 8 km h(-1) 142·6 ± 37·2 versus 156·4 ± 34·9 counts (P<0·01 for all levels of speed). Data from the old generation... (More)
- We compared, head-to-head, the old generation Actigraph model 7164 with the new generation Actigraph GT1M accelerometer. A total of 15 randomly selected teenagers (eight girls and seven boys) were investigated. They performed a treadmill test wearing the two kinds of accelerometers around the waist simultaneously. The treadmill test consisted of three different levels of speed 4, 6 and 8 km h(-1) for four consecutive minutes. Accelerometer counts per 1 sec epoch for the Actigraph GT1M versus the Actigraph 7164 were at 4 km h(-1) 21·6 ± 12·9 versus 26·5 ± 11·5 counts, at 6 km h(-1) 56·0 ± 23·2 versus 62·9 ± 25·6 counts and at 8 km h(-1) 142·6 ± 37·2 versus 156·4 ± 34·9 counts (P<0·01 for all levels of speed). Data from the old generation Actigraph 7164 and the new generation Actigraph GT1M accelerometers differ, where the Actigraph GT1M generates 10-23% lower values. Correction equation for Actigraph GT1M was Actigraph 7164 = 5·2484 + Actigraph GT1M counts × 1·0448. These results need to be taken into consideration when using these devices. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/3560200
- author
- Tanha, Tina
LU
; Tornberg, Åsa
LU
; Wollmer, Per
LU
and Dencker, Magnus
LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2013
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging
- volume
- 33
- issue
- 2
- pages
- 162 - 165
- publisher
- John Wiley & Sons Inc.
- external identifiers
-
- wos:000314658400011
- pmid:23383695
- scopus:84873467446
- ISSN
- 1475-0961
- DOI
- 10.1111/cpf.12003
- project
- Träning och tester inom idrott och hälsa
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 5380e85c-ed09-4efb-a5fe-4ab6439ee73f (old id 3560200)
- alternative location
- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23383695?dopt=Abstract
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-04 08:06:44
- date last changed
- 2023-09-05 14:15:48
@article{5380e85c-ed09-4efb-a5fe-4ab6439ee73f,
abstract = {{We compared, head-to-head, the old generation Actigraph model 7164 with the new generation Actigraph GT1M accelerometer. A total of 15 randomly selected teenagers (eight girls and seven boys) were investigated. They performed a treadmill test wearing the two kinds of accelerometers around the waist simultaneously. The treadmill test consisted of three different levels of speed 4, 6 and 8 km h(-1) for four consecutive minutes. Accelerometer counts per 1 sec epoch for the Actigraph GT1M versus the Actigraph 7164 were at 4 km h(-1) 21·6 ± 12·9 versus 26·5 ± 11·5 counts, at 6 km h(-1) 56·0 ± 23·2 versus 62·9 ± 25·6 counts and at 8 km h(-1) 142·6 ± 37·2 versus 156·4 ± 34·9 counts (P<0·01 for all levels of speed). Data from the old generation Actigraph 7164 and the new generation Actigraph GT1M accelerometers differ, where the Actigraph GT1M generates 10-23% lower values. Correction equation for Actigraph GT1M was Actigraph 7164 = 5·2484 + Actigraph GT1M counts × 1·0448. These results need to be taken into consideration when using these devices.}},
author = {{Tanha, Tina and Tornberg, Åsa and Wollmer, Per and Dencker, Magnus}},
issn = {{1475-0961}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{2}},
pages = {{162--165}},
publisher = {{John Wiley & Sons Inc.}},
series = {{Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging}},
title = {{Head-to-head comparison between Actigraph 7164 and GT1M accelerometers in adolescents.}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12003}},
doi = {{10.1111/cpf.12003}},
volume = {{33}},
year = {{2013}},
}