How much do we really care what we pick? : Pre-verbal and verbal investment in choices concerning faces and figures
Mouratidou, Alexandra LU ; Zlatev, Jordan LU and van de Weijer, Joost LU
(2022)
In Topoi
41(4).
p.695-713
- Abstract
- Every day we make choices, but our degree of investment in them differs, both in terms of pre-verbal experience and verbal justification. In an earlier experimental study, participants were asked to pick the more attractive one among two human faces, and among two abstract figures, and later to provide verbal motivations for these choices. They did not know that in some of the cases their choices were manipulated (i.e., they were asked to motivate the item they had not chosen). Against claims about our unreliability as conscious agents (Nisbett et al. in Psychol Rev 84:231–259, 2013; Johansson et al. in Science 310:116–119, 2005), the study found that in about half the cases the manipulations were detected. In the present study, we... (More)
- Every day we make choices, but our degree of investment in them differs, both in terms of pre-verbal experience and verbal justification. In an earlier experimental study, participants were asked to pick the more attractive one among two human faces, and among two abstract figures, and later to provide verbal motivations for these choices. They did not know that in some of the cases their choices were manipulated (i.e., they were asked to motivate the item they had not chosen). Against claims about our unreliability as conscious agents (Nisbett et al. in Psychol Rev 84:231–259, 2013; Johansson et al. in Science 310:116–119, 2005), the study found that in about half the cases the manipulations were detected. In the present study, we investigated whether varying degrees of choice investment could be an explanatory factor for such findings. We analysed the verbal justifications of the participants along a set of semantic categories, based on theoretical ideas from phenomenology and cognitive linguistics, and formulated a matrix of eleven markers of choice investment. We predicted a greater degree of investment when motivating (a) choices of faces than figures, (b) manipulated than actual choices, and (c) detected than non-detected manipulations. These predictions were confirmed, but with various strength. This allows us to argue for both consilience and differences between pre-verbal choice investment and the corresponding verbal motivations of the choices made, and thus for (degrees of) conscious awareness of choice making. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/5cc95b17-3660-4956-908f-a73223f5b23c
- author
- Mouratidou, Alexandra
LU
; Zlatev, Jordan
LU
and van de Weijer, Joost
LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2022-06-01
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Topoi
- volume
- 41
- issue
- 4
- pages
- 19 pages
- publisher
- Springer
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85131313921
- ISSN
- 0167-7411
- DOI
- 10.1007/s11245-022-09807-z
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 5cc95b17-3660-4956-908f-a73223f5b23c
- date added to LUP
- 2022-08-22 11:36:21
- date last changed
- 2023-12-05 19:18:16
@article{5cc95b17-3660-4956-908f-a73223f5b23c,
abstract = {{Every day we make choices, but our degree of investment in them differs, both in terms of pre-verbal experience and verbal justification. In an earlier experimental study, participants were asked to pick the more attractive one among two human faces, and among two abstract figures, and later to provide verbal motivations for these choices. They did not know that in some of the cases their choices were manipulated (i.e., they were asked to motivate the item they had not chosen). Against claims about our unreliability as conscious agents (Nisbett et al. in Psychol Rev 84:231–259, 2013; Johansson et al. in Science 310:116–119, 2005), the study found that in about half the cases the manipulations were detected. In the present study, we investigated whether varying degrees of choice investment could be an explanatory factor for such findings. We analysed the verbal justifications of the participants along a set of semantic categories, based on theoretical ideas from phenomenology and cognitive linguistics, and formulated a matrix of eleven markers of choice investment. We predicted a greater degree of investment when motivating (a) choices of faces than figures, (b) manipulated than actual choices, and (c) detected than non-detected manipulations. These predictions were confirmed, but with various strength. This allows us to argue for both consilience and differences between pre-verbal choice investment and the corresponding verbal motivations of the choices made, and thus for (degrees of) conscious awareness of choice making.}},
author = {{Mouratidou, Alexandra and Zlatev, Jordan and van de Weijer, Joost}},
issn = {{0167-7411}},
language = {{eng}},
month = {{06}},
number = {{4}},
pages = {{695--713}},
publisher = {{Springer}},
series = {{Topoi}},
title = {{How much do we really care what we pick? : Pre-verbal and verbal investment in choices concerning faces and figures}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11245-022-09807-z}},
doi = {{10.1007/s11245-022-09807-z}},
volume = {{41}},
year = {{2022}},
}