Ways to improve guideline adherence in the emergency department: an interview study on the management of traumatic brain injuries
(2022) In European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 48(6). p.4499-4508- Abstract
- Purpose
The aim was to explore factors affecting guideline adherence among doctors in the emergency department and to explore the general perception about local guidelines for traumatic brain injuries.
Methods
Thirty semi-structured interviews were conducted with doctors with experience working in the emergency department regarding different aspects of guideline use, with emphasis on the management of traumatic brain injuries. Twenty-eight interviews were included for analysis. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analysed iteratively. Emergent codes were identified and organised into themes and subthemes.
Results
Eight themes were identified. Barriers were centred on low availability of local... (More) - Purpose
The aim was to explore factors affecting guideline adherence among doctors in the emergency department and to explore the general perception about local guidelines for traumatic brain injuries.
Methods
Thirty semi-structured interviews were conducted with doctors with experience working in the emergency department regarding different aspects of guideline use, with emphasis on the management of traumatic brain injuries. Twenty-eight interviews were included for analysis. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analysed iteratively. Emergent codes were identified and organised into themes and subthemes.
Results
Eight themes were identified. Barriers were centred on low availability of local guidelines and guideline document design. Facilitating factors included a concise document, appropriate visual aids, high accessibility, and encouragement by management and senior peers. The local guidelines on traumatic brain injuries were regarded as distinct, but it was occasionally difficult to determine when they were applicable. Mandatory admission of patients on anticoagulants was sometimes perceived as excessive. Biomarker S100b was believed to sometimes lead to delayed care.
Conclusion
The participants believed that guideline adherence would increase by facilitating guideline availability, by providing concise, easy-to-understand, and well-illustrated guidelines available in printed form, as well as establishing a culture that promotes guideline use. The local guidelines for traumatic brain injuries were appreciated, but could be improved. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/649eae39-83d4-476a-a4e1-faa21d95cac4
- author
- Vestlund, Sebastian LU ; Vedin, Tomas LU ; Edelhamre, Marcus LU ; Lindén, Magnus LU and Larsson, Per-Anders LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2022
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
- volume
- 48
- issue
- 6
- pages
- 4499 - 4508
- publisher
- Urban & Vogel
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85124161561
- pmid:35113171
- ISSN
- 1863-9933
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00068-021-01853-3
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 649eae39-83d4-476a-a4e1-faa21d95cac4
- date added to LUP
- 2022-02-04 11:04:29
- date last changed
- 2023-01-16 10:17:33
@article{649eae39-83d4-476a-a4e1-faa21d95cac4,
abstract = {{Purpose<br/><br/>The aim was to explore factors affecting guideline adherence among doctors in the emergency department and to explore the general perception about local guidelines for traumatic brain injuries.<br/>Methods<br/><br/>Thirty semi-structured interviews were conducted with doctors with experience working in the emergency department regarding different aspects of guideline use, with emphasis on the management of traumatic brain injuries. Twenty-eight interviews were included for analysis. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analysed iteratively. Emergent codes were identified and organised into themes and subthemes.<br/>Results<br/><br/>Eight themes were identified. Barriers were centred on low availability of local guidelines and guideline document design. Facilitating factors included a concise document, appropriate visual aids, high accessibility, and encouragement by management and senior peers. The local guidelines on traumatic brain injuries were regarded as distinct, but it was occasionally difficult to determine when they were applicable. Mandatory admission of patients on anticoagulants was sometimes perceived as excessive. Biomarker S100b was believed to sometimes lead to delayed care.<br/>Conclusion<br/><br/>The participants believed that guideline adherence would increase by facilitating guideline availability, by providing concise, easy-to-understand, and well-illustrated guidelines available in printed form, as well as establishing a culture that promotes guideline use. The local guidelines for traumatic brain injuries were appreciated, but could be improved.}},
author = {{Vestlund, Sebastian and Vedin, Tomas and Edelhamre, Marcus and Lindén, Magnus and Larsson, Per-Anders}},
issn = {{1863-9933}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{6}},
pages = {{4499--4508}},
publisher = {{Urban & Vogel}},
series = {{European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery}},
title = {{Ways to improve guideline adherence in the emergency department: an interview study on the management of traumatic brain injuries}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-021-01853-3}},
doi = {{10.1007/s00068-021-01853-3}},
volume = {{48}},
year = {{2022}},
}