Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Cognitive factive verbs across languages

Colonna Dahlman, Roberta LU and van de Weijer, Joost LU orcid (2022) In Language Sciences 90.
Abstract
In the last few years, the traditional analysis of know as a factive verb has been lively debated by linguists and philosophers of language: several scholars have pointed out that know may be used non-factively in ordinary language. The aim of the present study is to expand this inquiry to other cognitive factive verbs than know, such as discover, realize, etc., and to investigate cross-linguistically the question of whether know and other cognitive factive verbs may occur in non-factive contexts, that is, in contexts where it is clear that the embedded proposition is false. Moreover, we investigate whether so-called evidential uses of cognitive factive verbs are acceptable across languages. We administered an online survey to native... (More)
In the last few years, the traditional analysis of know as a factive verb has been lively debated by linguists and philosophers of language: several scholars have pointed out that know may be used non-factively in ordinary language. The aim of the present study is to expand this inquiry to other cognitive factive verbs than know, such as discover, realize, etc., and to investigate cross-linguistically the question of whether know and other cognitive factive verbs may occur in non-factive contexts, that is, in contexts where it is clear that the embedded proposition is false. Moreover, we investigate whether so-called evidential uses of cognitive factive verbs are acceptable across languages. We administered an online survey to native speakers of nine different languages (English, French, German, Greek, Italian, Portuguese, Serbian, Spanish, and Swedish), and we found considerable cross-linguistic variation in the acceptability of the use of know and other cognitive factive verbs in non-factive contexts. For Italian and English, we put forward the claim that non-factive uses of cognitive factives instantiate a case of polysemy resulting from a process of semantic change that moves along a three-step pattern: from a factive sense to a more general non-factive sense to a non-factive sense characterized by an evidential function. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
factivity
in
Language Sciences
volume
90
article number
101458
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • scopus:85123731890
ISSN
0388-0001
DOI
10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101458
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
656300cb-28f5-42f3-a2f0-e06d6b5e3c21
date added to LUP
2022-01-11 08:57:33
date last changed
2022-04-25 22:14:13
@article{656300cb-28f5-42f3-a2f0-e06d6b5e3c21,
  abstract     = {{In the last few years, the traditional analysis of know as a factive verb has been lively debated by linguists and philosophers of language: several scholars have pointed out that know may be used non-factively in ordinary language. The aim of the present study is to expand this inquiry to other cognitive factive verbs than know, such as discover, realize, etc., and to investigate cross-linguistically the question of whether know and other cognitive factive verbs may occur in non-factive contexts, that is, in contexts where it is clear that the embedded proposition is false. Moreover, we investigate whether so-called evidential uses of cognitive factive verbs are acceptable across languages. We administered an online survey to native speakers of nine different languages (English, French, German, Greek, Italian, Portuguese, Serbian, Spanish, and Swedish), and we found considerable cross-linguistic variation in the acceptability of the use of know and other cognitive factive verbs in non-factive contexts. For Italian and English, we put forward the claim that non-factive uses of cognitive factives instantiate a case of polysemy resulting from a process of semantic change that moves along a three-step pattern: from a factive sense to a more general non-factive sense to a non-factive sense characterized by an evidential function.}},
  author       = {{Colonna Dahlman, Roberta and van de Weijer, Joost}},
  issn         = {{0388-0001}},
  keywords     = {{factivity}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  series       = {{Language Sciences}},
  title        = {{Cognitive factive verbs across languages}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101458}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101458}},
  volume       = {{90}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}