Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Fearing mRNA : A mixed methods study of vaccine rumours

Hammarlin, Mia-Marie LU orcid ; Kokkinakis, Dimitrios ; Miegel, Fredrik LU and Stoencheva, Jullietta (2024) p.157-184
Abstract
The first mass-distributed vaccines based on mRNA technology were launched in 2021 to protect against COVID-19, sparking rumours among vaccine critical individuals that these “new” vaccines might be more dangerous to the health than other, “traditional” vaccines. Drawing on rumour theories and social cognitive perspectives, the aim of this chapter is to account for the purpose and the spreading of medical rumours that encircle mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. We ask: How are rumours concerning mRNA expressed and established? In terms of trust and distrust, what function do the rumours have? We take as our empirical case the fast spreading of a medical journal article written by a group of infectious medicine researchers at Lund University, Sweden,... (More)
The first mass-distributed vaccines based on mRNA technology were launched in 2021 to protect against COVID-19, sparking rumours among vaccine critical individuals that these “new” vaccines might be more dangerous to the health than other, “traditional” vaccines. Drawing on rumour theories and social cognitive perspectives, the aim of this chapter is to account for the purpose and the spreading of medical rumours that encircle mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. We ask: How are rumours concerning mRNA expressed and established? In terms of trust and distrust, what function do the rumours have? We take as our empirical case the fast spreading of a medical journal article written by a group of infectious medicine researchers at Lund University, Sweden, that spawned an already established vaccine rumour, and analyse Swedish-language tweets discussing mRNA vaccines posted between February 10, 2022 and November 10, 2022. Our study follows a mixed methods sequential explanatory design consisting of an initial computational distant reading analysis based on structural topic modeling, followed by a close qualitative reading and thematic analysis of the results. Our analysis shows how mRNA rumours are not primarily based on ignorance, but rather on distrust regarding the officially sanctioned, positive narrative of new vaccine technologies, expressed through what we term counter-scientific argumentation. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
publication status
published
subject
host publication
Vaccine Hesitancy in the Nordic Countries : Trust and Distrust During the COVID-19 Pandemic - Trust and Distrust During the COVID-19 Pandemic
editor
Borin, Lars ; Hammarlin, Mia-Marie ; Kokkinakis, Dimitrios and Miegel, Fredrik
pages
28 pages
publisher
Routledge
external identifiers
  • scopus:85191455256
ISBN
9781032305998
9781032306001
9781003305859
DOI
10.4324/9781003305859
project
Rumour Mining: Vaccination engagement on the internet
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
6b138d92-ee8c-455f-858d-c24889df3ba1
date added to LUP
2024-01-22 11:35:32
date last changed
2025-07-04 00:35:05
@inbook{6b138d92-ee8c-455f-858d-c24889df3ba1,
  abstract     = {{The first mass-distributed vaccines based on mRNA technology were launched in 2021 to protect against COVID-19, sparking rumours among vaccine critical individuals that these “new” vaccines might be more dangerous to the health than other, “traditional” vaccines. Drawing on rumour theories and social cognitive perspectives, the aim of this chapter is to account for the purpose and the spreading of medical rumours that encircle mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. We ask: How are rumours concerning mRNA expressed and established? In terms of trust and distrust, what function do the rumours have? We take as our empirical case the fast spreading of a medical journal article written by a group of infectious medicine researchers at Lund University, Sweden, that spawned an already established vaccine rumour, and analyse Swedish-language tweets discussing mRNA vaccines posted between February 10, 2022 and November 10, 2022. Our study follows a mixed methods sequential explanatory design consisting of an initial computational distant reading analysis based on structural topic modeling, followed by a close qualitative reading and thematic analysis of the results. Our analysis shows how mRNA rumours are not primarily based on ignorance, but rather on distrust regarding the officially sanctioned, positive narrative of new vaccine technologies, expressed through what we term counter-scientific argumentation.}},
  author       = {{Hammarlin, Mia-Marie and Kokkinakis, Dimitrios and Miegel, Fredrik and Stoencheva, Jullietta}},
  booktitle    = {{Vaccine Hesitancy in the Nordic Countries : Trust and Distrust During the COVID-19 Pandemic}},
  editor       = {{Borin, Lars and Hammarlin, Mia-Marie and Kokkinakis, Dimitrios and Miegel, Fredrik}},
  isbn         = {{9781032305998}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{04}},
  pages        = {{157--184}},
  publisher    = {{Routledge}},
  title        = {{Fearing mRNA : A mixed methods study of vaccine rumours}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003305859}},
  doi          = {{10.4324/9781003305859}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}